LC-MS-based methodology for global metabolite profiling in metabonomics/metabolomics
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NMR is robust, nondestructive, and quantitative but has relatively low sensitivity, limiting its coverage of the food metabolome to predominant nutrients, sugars, and microbial metabolites at millimolar to micromolar concentrations.
“Briefly, NMR is robust, nondestructive, and quantitative but has a relatively low sensitivity, which narrows its coverage of the food metabolome to predominant nutrients, sugars, and microbial metabolites present at millimolar to micromolar concentrations.”
From The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure (2014) · cites this paper as [111]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 371
- Authors
- Theodoridis, G., Gika, H. G., & Wilson, I. D.
- Affiliations
- AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Ian D.
- Venue
- TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 251-260
- ISSN
- 0165-9936 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043547988
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- metabolomics, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, biological fluids, tissue extracts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
