The roles of ionic liquids in sorptive microextraction techniques
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low-density solvents are simple solvents and their extraction versatility and efficiency cannot compete with more complex 'tailor-made' extraction solvents.
“Moreover, LDSs are still simple solvents and their extraction versatility and efficiency cannot compete with more complex 'tailor-made' extraction solvents described in the following sections [24,25].”
From Use of green alternative solvents in dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction: A review (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 171
- Authors
- Aguilera-Herrador, E., Lucena, R., Cárdenas, S., & Valcárcel, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Córdoba (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Valcárcel, Miguel
- Venue
- TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 602-616
- ISSN
- 0165-9936 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017008679
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 23.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Junta de Andalucía
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Keywords
- ionic liquids, solid-phase microextraction, liquid-phase microextraction, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction, single-drop microextraction, sample preparation, extraction solvents, desorption solvent, extraction selectivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
