Data analysis strategies for targeted and untargeted LC-MS metabolomic studies: Overview and workflow
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensitivity is a challenge in untargeted methods, and many metabolites are detected in some but not other samples, which limits the utility of many analytes for modelling.
“Sensitivity is another challenge in untargeted methods, and many metabolites are detected in some but not other samples122–124, which limits the utility of many analytes for modelling.”
From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [124]
Targeted methods have better sensitivity but are limited by predefining a set of metabolites to look for, greatly reducing the number of features detected and precluding the discovery of new metabolites.
“Targeted methods have better sensitivity but are limited by predefining a set of metabolites to look for in the experiment, greatly reducing the number of features detected and precluding the discovery of new metabolites122–124.”
From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [124]
Untargeted metabolomics methods have the advantage of detecting many thousands of metabolite features; however, most compounds detected via mass spectrometry and NMR are orphan compounds whose structure has not been identified.
“Untargeted metabolomics methods have the advantage of being able to detect many thousands of metabolite features; however, most compounds detected via mass spectrometry and NMR are orphan compounds, that is, their structure has not been identified122–124.”
From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [124]
In both targeted and untargeted methods, even for confidently identified compounds, the biological processes that generated them are often poorly understood.
“In both targeted and untargeted methods, even for confidently identified compounds, the biological processes that generated them are often poorly understood122–125.”
From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [124]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 205 · Cited by 352
- Authors
- Gorrochategui, E., Jaumot, J., Lacorte, S., & Tauler, R.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Venue
- TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 425-442
- ISSN
- 0165-9936 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2504864929
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 205
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 17.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Research Council (320737)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- LC-MS metabolomics, targeted metabolomics, untargeted metabolomics, data analysis pipeline, high-resolution mass spectrometry, sample classification, biomarker discovery, chemometrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review