The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent trends in nanomaterial-modified electrodes for electroanalytical applications
Abstract
Abstract Electroanalytical devices have entered into the entirely new phase due to the utilization of the nanomaterials for the fabrication of electrochemical sensors. Nanomaterials with controlled morphologies and better surface functionalization offer ultrasensitive and selective electrode surfaces for electrochemical detection. The recent literature search on the fabrication of electrochemical sensors clearly reveals a shift toward morphologically controlled and suitably functionalized electrode modifiers to achieve robust electrochemical sensors. This review is specifically focused on the recent trends in the utilization of the various nanomaterials as modifiers in electrochemical sensing. These materials include fullerene, carbon nanotubes, carbon nanohorns, graphene, 3D graphene, carbon quantum dots, nanostructured polymers, and morphologically controlled metal/non-metal nanostructures. Such materials have been applied in the form of wires, nanorods, nanoribbons, core-shell, nanohorns to improve the surface kinetics and specificity of the modified surface toward electroanalytical detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, H., Maiyalagan, T., & Wang, X. (2012) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs200652y · Cited by 3,618
Glowing Graphene Quantum Dots and Carbon Dots: Properties, Syntheses, and Biological Applications
Zheng, X. T., Ananthanarayanan, A., Luo, K. Q., & Chen, P. (2015) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201402648 · Cited by 2,190
Georgakilas, V., Perman, J. A., Tucek, J., & Zboril, R. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500304f · Cited by 2,147
Cited by
Green analytical chemistry metrics: a review
Sajid, M., & Płotka-Wasylka, J. (2022) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123046 · Cited by 744
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baig, N., Sajid, M., & Saleh, T. A.
- Venue
- TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 47-61
- ISSN
- 0165-9936 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2905284857
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
