Atypical Deep Eutectic Solvents: New Opportunities for Chemical Analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The direct connection between DES extraction and analytical instruments enables real-time sample processing, which helps shorten the time required for analyzing complex samples.
“The direct connection between DES extraction and analytical instruments enables real-time sample processing, which helps shorten the time required for analyzing complex samples [127].”
From Eco-Friendly Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Extraction Technologies: A Comprehensive Review of Principles, Applications, and Comparative Insights (2026) · cites this paper as [127]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 278 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Shishov, A., El-Deen, A. K., Godunov, P., & Bulatov, A.
- Affiliations
- St Petersburg University (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Shishov, Andrey
- Venue
- TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-07
- Volume
- 176
- Pages
- 117752
- ISSN
- 0165-9936 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4396777628
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 278
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 8
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Lubricants and Their Additives
- Keywords
- deep eutectic solvents, green solvents, organic solvent replacement, analytical applications, solvent properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
