The sustainable mobility paradigm
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Accessibility and mobility are two very different but correlated concepts to take into account.
“accessibility and mobility are two very different but correlated concepts to take into account.”
From Implications of Autonomous Vehicles for Accessibility and Transport Equity: A Framework Based on Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [72]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 2,778
- Authors
- Banister, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Banister, David
- ORCID
- Banister, David
- Venue
- Transport Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 73-80
- ISSN
- 0967-070X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157231424
- Cited by
- 2,778
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 323 · 2025: 290 · 2024: 218 · 2023: 199 · 2022: 188 · 2021: 221 · 2020: 199 · 2019: 200 · 2018: 190 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 115 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 82
- FWCI
- 60.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transport Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Social Sciences › Transportation › transportation and logistics systems
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Keywords
- sustainable transport, transportation planning, urban sustainability, public acceptance, citizen participation, paradigm shift
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
