Pancreas Versus Islet Transplantation in Diabetes Mellitus: How to Allocate Deceased Donor Pancreata?
Abstract
Transplant options for the diabetic recipient include pancreas and islet transplantation. Pancreas transplantation has been increasingly performed in the last 3 decades with increasing success rates. Nevertheless, islet transplantation offers the advantage of being less invasive with fewer complications. However, current experience shows that multiple transplants are required to achieve and maintain insulin-independence in the intermediate term, and long-term function remains a problem even with multiple transplants. Early successes with single-donor islet transplants are encouraging and if maintained will largely substitute pancreas transplants. Currently, single-donor islet transplants have been shown to work in recipients with low insulin requirements who receive a pancreas from a donor with high body mass index. However, pancreas transplants from obese donors are associated with increased surgical risk. Therefore, it is logical to preferentially allocate obese donor pancreata to islet recipients. In addition, older donor (50 to 65 years) pancreata could be preferentially allocated to islets since their islet yield is still good, whereas they are associated with decreased survival in whole-organ pancreas transplants. With increasing efficiency and success of islet transplants the criteria for pancreas allocation for islets will need to be periodically reviewed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selection criteria for PTA minimize operative mortality (<1%) and reduce early technical pancreas graft loss (<10%).
“These selection criteria minimize operative mortality (<1%) and reduce early technical pancreas graft loss (<10%) (229,232).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Holt, R. I. G., DeVries, J. H., Hess-Fischl, A., Hirsch, I. B., Kirkman, M. S., Klupa, T., Ludwig, B., Nørgaard, K., Pettus, J., Renard, E., et al. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci21-0043 · Cited by 699 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kandaswamy, R., & Sutherland, D. E. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kandaswamy, R.
- Venue
- Transplantation Proceedings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 365-367
- ISSN
- 0041-1345 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019199876
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transplantation Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
- Keywords
- pancreas transplantation, islet transplantation, deceased donor allocation, obesity, donor age, islet yield, insulin independence, type 1 diabetes, organ allocation policy
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Obesity, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Tissue Donors, United States, Waiting Lists, Health Care Rationing, Pancreas Transplantation, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review