The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incorporating human-factors in car-following models: A review of recent developments and research needs
Open accessAbstract
Over the past decades there has been a considerable development in the modeling of car-following (CF) behavior as a result of research undertaken by both traffic engineers and traffic psychologists. While traffic engineers seek to understand the behavior of a traffic stream, traffic psychologists seek to describe the human abilities and errors involved in the driving process. This paper provides a comprehensive review of these two research streams. It is necessary to consider human-factors in {CF} modeling for a more realistic representation of {CF} behavior in complex driving situations (for example, in traffic breakdowns, crash-prone situations, and adverse weather conditions) to improve traffic safety and to better understand widely-reported puzzling traffic flow phenomena, such as capacity drop, stop-and-go oscillations, and traffic hysteresis. While there are some excellent reviews of {CF} models available in the literature, none of these specifically focuses on the human factors in these models. This paper addresses this gap by reviewing the available literature with a specific focus on the latest advances in car-following models from both the engineering and human behavior points of view. In so doing, it analyses the benefits and limitations of various models and highlights future research needs in the area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Stanton, N. A., & Salmon, P. M. (2009) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.03.006 · Cited by 336
Cited by
Human-like autonomous car-following model with deep reinforcement learning
Zhu, M., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.024 · Cited by 533
Makridis, M., Mattas, K., Anesiadou, A., & Ciuffo, B. (2021) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103047 · Cited by 258
Traffic capacity implications of automated vehicles mixed with regular vehicles
Olia, A., Razavi, S., Abdulhai, B., & Abdelgawad, H. (2018) · Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1080/15472450.2017.1404680 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Saifuzzaman, M., & Zheng, Z.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 379-403
- ISSN
- 0968-090X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1592568942
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incorporating human-factors in car-following models: A review of recent developments and research needs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.008
- The paper
- Saifuzzaman, M., & Zheng, Z. (2014). Incorporating human-factors in car-following models: A review of recent developments and research needs. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.