Congestion-aware system optimal route choice for shared autonomous vehicles
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only four studies have been found for reservation-based SAV systems.
“and only four studies have been found for reservation-based system (Lamotte et al., 2017;Levin, 2017;Ma et al., 2017;Pimenta et al., 2017).”
From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Levin, 2017
For reservation-based systems, based on the reviewed studies, only Levin (2017) uses a traffic assignment component by including an analytical model based on dynamic system optimal assignment.
“For reservation-based systems, to the best of authors' knowledge and based on the studies reviewed, only Levin (2017) uses a traffic assignment component by including an analytical model, which is based on dynamic system optimal assignment.”
From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Levin (2017)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Planning and Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles
Schwarting, W., Alonso-Mora, J., & Rus, D. (2018) · Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-060117-105157 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review
Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E., & Antoniou, C. (2020) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.008 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
- Authors
- Levin, M. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Levin, Michael W.
- ORCID
- Levin, Michael W.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 229-247
- ISSN
- 0968-090X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2731786593
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Keywords
- shared autonomous vehicles, traffic congestion, link transmission model, kinematic wave theory, fleet size optimization, peak hour demand, waiting time, in-vehicle travel time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
