Will all autonomous cars cooperate? Brands' strategic interactions under dynamic congestion
Open accessAbstract
Autonomous cars allow safe driving with a smaller headway than that required for normal human-driven cars, thereby potentially improving road capacity. To attain this capacity benefit, cooperation among autonomous cars is vital. However, the future market may have multiple car brands and the incentive for them to cooperate is unknown. This paper investigates the competition and cooperation between multiple car brands that, may provide both autonomous and normal vehicles. We develop a two-stage game-theoretic model to investigate brands’ strategic interactions and evaluate, from both policy and organizational perspectives, the implications of their cooperation incentives and pricing competition. We compare four market structures: duopoly competition, perfect competition, a public welfare-maximizing monopoly, and a private profit-maximizing monopoly. Various parameters are evaluated, including factors such as the capacity benefits from cooperation, cooperation cost and price elasticity. This evaluation provides policy insights into actions that could be considered by regulators and organizations for the operation of autonomous cars.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The roadway will continue to have mixed traffic with vehicles of different ADS levels for a considerable period.
“In addition, the roadway will continue to have mixed traffic with vehicles of different ADS levels for a considerable period [2][3][4][5][6][7].”
From Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Safety by Operational Design Domains (ODD) in Mixed Traffic (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow
Shladover, S. E., Su, D., & Lu, X.-Y. (2012) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2324-08 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles
Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., & Leiby, P. (2016) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.001 · Cited by 859 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Arnott, R., de Palma, A., Lindsey, R., 1993. A structural model of peak-period congestion: A traffic bottleneck with elastic demand. The American Economic Review 83 (1), 161-179.
- Brueckner, J.K., 2002. Airport congestion when carriers have market power. American Economic Review 92 (5), 1357-1375.
- Burns, L.D., 2013. A vision of our transport future. Nature 497 (7448), 181-182.
- Daniel, J.I., 1995. Congestion pricing and capacity of large hub airports: A bottleneck model with stochastic queues. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 63 (2), 327-370.
- de Palma, A., Lindsey, R., 2000. Private toll roads: Competition under various ownership regimes. The Annals of Regional Science 34 (1), 13-35.
- Dixit, A., 1979. A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers. The Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1), 20-32.
- Fernandes, P., Nunes, U., 2012. Platooning with IVC-enabled autonomous vehicles: Strategies to mitigate communication delays, improve safety and traffic flow. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 13 (1), 91-106.
- Kuang, Z., Lian, Z., Lien, J.W., Zheng, J., 2020. Serial and parallel duopoly competition in multi-segment transportation routes. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 133, 101821.
- Li, Z.-C., Huang, H.-J., Yang, H., 2020. Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 139, 311-342.
- Lindsey, R., 2004. Existence, uniqueness, and trip cost function properties of user equilibrium in the bottleneck model with multiple user classes. Transportation Science 38 (3), 293-314.
- Pels, E., Verhoef, E.T., 2004. The economics of airport congestion pricing. Journal of Urban Economics 55 (2), 257-277.
- Pudāne, B., 2020. Departure time choice and bottleneck congestion with automated vehicles: Role of on-board activities. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 20 (4), 306-334.
- Silva, H.E., Verhoef, E.T., 2013. Optimal pricing of flights and passengers at congested airports and the efficiency of atomistic charges. Journal of Public Economics 106, 1-13.
- Small, K.A., 1982. The scheduling of consumer activities: Work trips. The American Economic Review 72 (3), 467-479.
- Small, K.A., 2015. The bottleneck model: An assessment and interpretation. Economics of Transportation 4 (1-2), 110-117.
- Small, K. A., & Verhoef, E. T. (2007). The Economics of Urban Transportation. Routledge.
- Sun, X., Yin, Y., 2021. An auction mechanism for platoon leader determination in single-brand cooperative vehicle platooning. Economics of Transportation 28, 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100233. · DOI
- Tang, Z.Y., Tian, L.J., Wang, D.Z.W., 2021. Multi-modal morning commute with endogenous shared autonomous vehicle penetration considering parking space constraint. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 151, 102354.
- Tientrakool, P., Ho, Y.C., Maxemchuk, N.F., 2011. Highway capacity benefits from using vehicle-to-vehicle communication and sensors for collision avoidance. 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).
- van den Berg, V., Verhoef, E.T., 2011a. Congestion tolling in the bottleneck model with heterogeneous values of time. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45 (1), 60-78.
- van den Berg, V., Verhoef, E.T., 2011b. Winning or losing from dynamic bottleneck congestion pricing? The distributional effects of road pricing with heterogeneity in values of time and schedule delay. Journal of Public Economics 95 (7-8), 983-992.
- Van Dender, K., 2005. Duopoly prices under congested access. Journal of Regional Science 45 (2), 343-362.
- van Wee, B., Annema, J.A., Banister, D. (Eds.), 2013. The Transport System and Transport Policy: An Introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 125-159.
- Vickrey, W., 1969. Congestion theory and transport investment. The American Economic Review 59 (2), 251-260.
- Wu, W., Zhang, F., Liu, W., Lodewijks, G., 2020. Modelling the traffic in a mixed network with autonomous-driving expressways and non-autonomous local streets. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 134, 101855.
- Zhang, A., Zhang, Y., 2006. Airport capacity and congestion when carriers have market power. Journal of Urban Economics 60 (2), 229-247.
- Zhang, W., Zhao, H., Jiang, R., 2018. Impact of capacity drop on commuting systems under uncertainty. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2018, 1-15.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Safety by Operational Design Domains (ODD) in Mixed Traffic
Kim, H., Ko, J., Oh, C., & Kim, S. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16229672 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Yu, X., & van den Berg, V. A. C. (2025) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2025.105320 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Yu, X., van den Berg, V. A. C., Verhoef, E. T., & Li, Z.-C.
- Affiliations
- Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN)
- Tinbergen Institute (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Xiaojuan
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 166
- Pages
- 102825
- ISSN
- 1366-5545 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4296906631
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-JPUE-0001)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71890970/71890974, 72201278, 71890970, 71961137001, 71890974)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Transport and Economic Policies
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, strategic interaction, road capacity, price competition, market structure, duopoly, monopoly, two-stage game, cost of cooperation, price elasticity, transport regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review