Cited by 11Transportation and Mobility InnovationsMerger and Competition AnalysisTransport and Economic Policies

Will all autonomous cars cooperate? Brands' strategic interactions under dynamic congestion

Open access
Yu, Xiaojuan, van den Berg, Vincent A.C., Verhoef, Erik T., Li, Zhi-Chun·2022·Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Abstract

Autonomous cars allow safe driving with a smaller headway than that required for normal human-driven cars, thereby potentially improving road capacity. To attain this capacity benefit, cooperation among autonomous cars is vital. However, the future market may have multiple car brands and the incentive for them to cooperate is unknown. This paper investigates the competition and cooperation between multiple car brands that, may provide both autonomous and normal vehicles. We develop a two-stage game-theoretic model to investigate brands’ strategic interactions and evaluate, from both policy and organizational perspectives, the implications of their cooperation incentives and pricing competition. We compare four market structures: duopoly competition, perfect competition, a public welfare-maximizing monopoly, and a private profit-maximizing monopoly. Various parameters are evaluated, including factors such as the capacity benefits from cooperation, cooperation cost and price elasticity. This evaluation provides policy insights into actions that could be considered by regulators and organizations for the operation of autonomous cars.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102825

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Arnott, R., de Palma, A., Lindsey, R., 1993. A structural model of peak-period congestion: A traffic bottleneck with elastic demand. The American Economic Review 83 (1), 161-179.
  2. Brueckner, J.K., 2002. Airport congestion when carriers have market power. American Economic Review 92 (5), 1357-1375.
  3. Burns, L.D., 2013. A vision of our transport future. Nature 497 (7448), 181-182.
  4. Daniel, J.I., 1995. Congestion pricing and capacity of large hub airports: A bottleneck model with stochastic queues. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 63 (2), 327-370.
  5. de Palma, A., Lindsey, R., 2000. Private toll roads: Competition under various ownership regimes. The Annals of Regional Science 34 (1), 13-35.
  6. Dixit, A., 1979. A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers. The Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1), 20-32.
  7. Fernandes, P., Nunes, U., 2012. Platooning with IVC-enabled autonomous vehicles: Strategies to mitigate communication delays, improve safety and traffic flow. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 13 (1), 91-106.
  8. Kuang, Z., Lian, Z., Lien, J.W., Zheng, J., 2020. Serial and parallel duopoly competition in multi-segment transportation routes. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 133, 101821.
  9. Li, Z.-C., Huang, H.-J., Yang, H., 2020. Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 139, 311-342.
  10. Lindsey, R., 2004. Existence, uniqueness, and trip cost function properties of user equilibrium in the bottleneck model with multiple user classes. Transportation Science 38 (3), 293-314.
  11. Pels, E., Verhoef, E.T., 2004. The economics of airport congestion pricing. Journal of Urban Economics 55 (2), 257-277.
  12. Pudāne, B., 2020. Departure time choice and bottleneck congestion with automated vehicles: Role of on-board activities. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 20 (4), 306-334.
  13. Silva, H.E., Verhoef, E.T., 2013. Optimal pricing of flights and passengers at congested airports and the efficiency of atomistic charges. Journal of Public Economics 106, 1-13.
  14. Small, K.A., 1982. The scheduling of consumer activities: Work trips. The American Economic Review 72 (3), 467-479.
  15. Small, K.A., 2015. The bottleneck model: An assessment and interpretation. Economics of Transportation 4 (1-2), 110-117.
  16. Small, K. A., & Verhoef, E. T. (2007). The Economics of Urban Transportation. Routledge.
  17. Sun, X., Yin, Y., 2021. An auction mechanism for platoon leader determination in single-brand cooperative vehicle platooning. Economics of Transportation 28, 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100233. · DOI
  18. Tang, Z.Y., Tian, L.J., Wang, D.Z.W., 2021. Multi-modal morning commute with endogenous shared autonomous vehicle penetration considering parking space constraint. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 151, 102354.
  19. Tientrakool, P., Ho, Y.C., Maxemchuk, N.F., 2011. Highway capacity benefits from using vehicle-to-vehicle communication and sensors for collision avoidance. 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).
  20. van den Berg, V., Verhoef, E.T., 2011a. Congestion tolling in the bottleneck model with heterogeneous values of time. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45 (1), 60-78.
  21. van den Berg, V., Verhoef, E.T., 2011b. Winning or losing from dynamic bottleneck congestion pricing? The distributional effects of road pricing with heterogeneity in values of time and schedule delay. Journal of Public Economics 95 (7-8), 983-992.
  22. Van Dender, K., 2005. Duopoly prices under congested access. Journal of Regional Science 45 (2), 343-362.
  23. van Wee, B., Annema, J.A., Banister, D. (Eds.), 2013. The Transport System and Transport Policy: An Introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 125-159.
  24. Vickrey, W., 1969. Congestion theory and transport investment. The American Economic Review 59 (2), 251-260.
  25. Wu, W., Zhang, F., Liu, W., Lodewijks, G., 2020. Modelling the traffic in a mixed network with autonomous-driving expressways and non-autonomous local streets. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 134, 101855.
  26. Zhang, A., Zhang, Y., 2006. Airport capacity and congestion when carriers have market power. Journal of Urban Economics 60 (2), 229-247.
  27. Zhang, W., Zhao, H., Jiang, R., 2018. Impact of capacity drop on commuting systems under uncertainty. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2018, 1-15.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, X., van den Berg, V. A. C., Verhoef, E. T., & Li, Z.-C.
Affiliations
  • Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN)
  • Tinbergen Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Yu, Xiaojuan
Venue
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
166
Pages
102825
ISSN
1366-5545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296906631
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-JPUE-0001)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71890970/71890974, 72201278, 71890970, 71961137001, 71890974)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Transport and Economic Policies
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, strategic interaction, road capacity, price competition, market structure, duopoly, monopoly, two-stage game, cost of cooperation, price elasticity, transport regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review