Cited by 57Traffic control and managementVehicle Routing Optimization MethodsTransportation and Mobility Innovations

Trajectory planning for autonomous modular vehicle docking and autonomous vehicle platooning operations

Open access
Li, Qianwen, Li, Xiaopeng·2022·Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102886

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q., & Li, X.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Qianwen
  • Li, Xiaopeng
Venue
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
166
Pages
102886
ISSN
1366-5545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293712235
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CMMI #1932452, CMMI #1558887)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Keywords
autonomous vehicle platooning, trajectory planning, Pontryagin maximum principle, quadratic programming, two-stage optimization, valid cuts, sensitivity analysis, long trains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review