Cited by 304Remote Sensing in AgricultureRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Regional ecosystem structure and function: ecological insights from remote sensing of tropical forests

Chambers, Jeffrey Q., Asner, Gregory P., Morton, Douglas C., Anderson, Liana O., Saatchi, Sassan S., Espírito-Santo, Fernando D.B., Palace, Michael, Souza, Carlos·2007·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Ecological studies in tropical forests have long been plagued by difficulties associated with sampling the crowns of large canopy trees and large inaccessible regions, such as the Amazon basin. Recent advances in remote sensing have overcome some of these obstacles, enabling progress towards tackling difficult ecological problems. Breakthroughs have helped transform the dialog between ecology and remote sensing, generating new regional perspectives on key environmental gradients and species assemblages with ecologically relevant measures such as canopy nutrient and moisture content, crown area, leaf-level drought responses, woody tissue and surface litter abundance, phenological patterns, and land-cover transitions. Issues that we address here include forest response to altered precipitation regimes, regional disturbance and land-use patterns, invasive species and landscape carbon balance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2007.05.001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Amazon and Nile river basins are two of the major river basins in the world.

    “These areas represent two of the major river basins in the world thereby making them desirable locations for monitoring forests, logging, soil and water managements [40, 41], and thus are of great interest to the international community.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chambers, J. Q., Asner, G. P., Morton, D. C., Anderson, L. O., Saatchi, S. S., Espírito-Santo, F. D. B., Palace, M., & Souza, C.
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
414-423
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151342319
Cited by
304
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
tropical forests, remote sensing of forests, crown area, surface litter, phenology, land cover change, precipitation regime change, land use change, invasive species
MeSH terms
Ecology, Humans, South America, Trees, Tropical Climate, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review