Cited by 1,170Animal Behavior and ReproductionEvolution and Genetic DynamicsMorphological variations and asymmetry

Phenotypic plasticity's impacts on diversification and speciation

Pfennig, David W., Wund, Matthew A., Snell-Rood, Emilie C., Cruickshank, Tami, Schlichting, Carl D., Moczek, Armin P.·2010·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity (the ability of a single genotype to produce multiple phenotypes in response to variation in the environment) is commonplace. Yet its evolutionary significance remains controversial, especially in regard to whether and how it impacts diversification and speciation. Here, we review recent theory on how plasticity promotes: (i) the origin of novel phenotypes, (ii) divergence among populations and species, (iii) the formation of new species and (iv) adaptive radiation. We also discuss the latest empirical support for each of these evolutionary pathways to diversification and identify potentially profitable areas for future research. Generally, phenotypic plasticity can play a largely underappreciated role in driving diversification and speciation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2010.05.006

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The high phenotypic plasticity demonstrated by type I species may act as a brake on adaptive evolution and diversification, because highly plastic populations are likely to persist easily and undergo less genetic change.

    “It is possible that the high phenotypic plasticity demonstrated by type I species may act as a brake on adaptive evolution and diversification, because highly plastic populations are likely to persist easily and undergo less genetic change (Price et al. , 2003; Pfennig et al. , 2010).”

    From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Pfennig et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfennig, D. W., Wund, M. A., Snell-Rood, E. C., Cruickshank, T., Schlichting, C. D., & Moczek, A. P.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Pfennig, David W.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
459-467
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137621906
Cited by
1,170
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 63
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Evolutionary Synthesis Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
phenotypic plasticity, speciation, diversification, adaptive radiation, population divergence, novel phenotype, evolutionary pathways
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Phenotype, Biodiversity, Genetic Speciation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review