Next-Generation Global Biomonitoring: Large-scale, Automated Reconstruction of Ecological Networks
Open accessAbstract
We foresee a new global-scale, ecological approach to biomonitoring emerging within the next decade that can detect ecosystem change accurately, cheaply, and generically. Next-generation sequencing of DNA sampled from the Earth's environments would provide data for the relative abundance of operational taxonomic units or ecological functions. Machine-learning methods would then be used to reconstruct the ecological networks of interactions implicit in the raw NGS data. Ultimately, we envision the development of autonomous samplers that would sample nucleic acids and upload NGS sequence data to the cloud for network reconstruction. Large numbers of these samplers, in a global array, would allow sensitive automated biomonitoring of the Earth's major ecosystems at high spatial and temporal resolution, revolutionising our understanding of ecosystem change.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There has been much recent work on applying ILP in ecology.
“There has been much recent work on applying ILP in ecology (Bohan et al., 2011; Tamaddoni-Nezhad et al., 2014; Bohan et al., 2017).”
From Inductive Logic Programming At 30: A New Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as Bohan et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 200
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Island Press
- Petchey, O.L. et al. (2008) Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 4191-4196
- Raffaelli, D. (2006) Food webs, body size and the curse of the Latin binomial. In Energetics to Ecosystems: The Dynamics and Structure of Ecological Systems (Rooney, N. et al., eds), Springer, pp. 53-64
- Haughton, A.J. et al. (2003) Invertebrate responses to the man- agement of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conven- tional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 358, 1863-1877
- Bohan, D.A. et al. (2005) Effects on weed and invertebrate abun- dance and diversity of herbicide management in genetically modi- fied herbicide-tolerant winter-sown oilseed rape. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 272, 463-474
- Muggleton, S.H. et al. (2000) Theory completion using inverse entailment. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming Springer, pp. 130-146
- Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A. et al. (2012) Machine learning a probabi- listic network of ecological interactions. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, LNAI 7207 Springer, pp. 332-346
- Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A. et al. (2015) Towards machine learning of predictive models from ecological data. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming Springer-Verlag, pp. 154-167
- Cotton, T.E.A. et al. (2014) What goes in must come out: testing for biases in molecular analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. PLoS One 9, e109234 66. Dumbrell, A.J. et al. (2017) Microbial community analysis by single- amplicon high-throughput next generation sequencing: data anal- ysis -from raw output to ecology. In Hydrocarbon and Lipid Micro- biology Protocols (McGenity, T.J. et al., eds), Springer, pp. 155-206
- Authors
- Bohan, D. A., Vacher, C., Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A., Raybould, A., Dumbrell, A. J., & Woodward, G.
- Affiliations
- Université de Bourgogne (FR)
- Université de Bordeaux (FR)
- Syngenta (France) (FR)
- University of Essex (GB)
- University of Trieste (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Bohan, David A.
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 477-487
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2601528672
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Imperial College London
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-SUSF-0002)
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/M02086X/1, NE/M020843/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- next-generation sequencing, environmental DNA, operational taxonomic units, machine learning, ecosystem change detection, ecological interactions
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, DNA, Ecology, Environmental Monitoring, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review