The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data Integration for Large-Scale Models of Species Distributions
Open accessAbstract
With the expansion in the quantity and types of biodiversity data being collected, there is a need to find ways to combine these different sources to provide cohesive summaries of species' potential and realized distributions in space and time. Recently, model-based data integration has emerged as a means to achieve this by combining datasets in ways that retain the strengths of each. We describe a flexible approach to data integration using point process models, which provide a convenient way to translate across ecological currencies. We highlight recent examples of large-scale ecological models based on data integration and outline the conceptual and technical challenges and opportunities that arise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stan : A Probabilistic Programming Language
Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v076.i01 · Cited by 7,754 · cited 1×
“Newer MCMC software, such as Stan [64] and greta [65], are potentially much quicker, but few comparisons for large ecological datasets exist.”
MethodA statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists
Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y. E., & Yates, C. J. (2011) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x · Cited by 6,699
WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility
Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1008929526011 · Cited by 5,368
Rue, H., Martino, S., & Chopin, N. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x · Cited by 5,279
JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling
Plummer, M. (2003) · Cited by 4,720
Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data
Banerjee, S., Carlin, B. P., & Gelfand, A. E. (2014) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b17115 · Cited by 2,500
Occupancy Estimation and Modeling. Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence
Yoccoz, N. G. (2006) · Wildlife Biology · doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[450:oeamip]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,300
A new dawn for citizen science
Silvertown, J. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017 · Cited by 2,183
Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling
Araújo, M. B., & Guisan, A. (2006) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01584.x · Cited by 1,901
Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence
MacKenzie, D. I. (2005) · Cited by 1,878
Cited by
A new avenue for Bayesian inference with INLA
Van Niekerk, J., Krainski, E., Rustand, D., & Rue, H. (2023) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2023.107692 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Isaac, N. J. B., Jarzyna, M. A., Keil, P., Dambly, L. I., Boersch-Supan, P. H., Browning, E., Freeman, S. N., Golding, N., Guillera-Arroita, G., Henrys, P. A., Jarvis, S., Lahoz-Monfort, J., Pagel, J., Pescott, O. L., Schmucki, R., Simmonds, E. G., & O’Hara, R. B.
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-67
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2982619951
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data Integration for Large-Scale Models of Species Distributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.006
- The paper
- Isaac, N. J. B., Jarzyna, M. A., Keil, P., Dambly, L. I., Boersch-Supan, P. H., Browning, E., Freeman, S. N., Golding, N., Guillera-Arroita, G., Henrys, P. A., Jarvis, S., Lahoz-Monfort, J., Pagel, J., Pescott, O. L., Schmucki, R., Simmonds, E. G., & O’Hara, R. B. (2020). Data Integration for Large-Scale Models of Species Distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
