Cited by 46Evolution and Genetic DynamicsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationPhilosophy and History of Science

Evolution of Cellular Differentiation: From Hypotheses to Models

Márquez-Zacarías, Pedro, Pineau, Rozenn M., Gomez, Marcella, Veliz-Cuba, Alan, Murrugarra, David, Ratcliff, William C., Niklas, Karl J.·2021·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Cellular differentiation is one of the hallmarks of complex multicellularity, allowing individual organisms to capitalize on among-cell functional diversity. The evolution of multicellularity is a major evolutionary transition that allowed for the increase of organismal complexity in multiple lineages, a process that relies on the functional integration of cell-types within an individual. Multiple hypotheses have been proposed to explain the origins of cellular differentiation, but we lack a general understanding of what makes one cell-type distinct from others, and how such differentiation arises. Here, we describe how the use of Boolean networks (BNs) can aid in placing empirical findings into a coherent conceptual framework, and we emphasize some of the standing problems when interpreting data and model behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2020.07.013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Symmetry breaking is partly responsible for the differentiation paths that allow the generation of specialized cell types.

    “Symmetry breaking is partly responsible for the differentiation paths that allow the generation of specialized cell types [197], often represented as dynamical paths on a Waddington epigenetic landscape (figure 6c) [211].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [197]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems

    Solé, R., Kempes, C. P., Corominas-Murtra, B., De Domenico, M., Kolchinsky, A., Lachmann, M., Libby, E., Saavedra, S., Smith, E., & Wolpert, D. (2024) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2024.0010 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

    “Symmetry breaking is partly responsible for the differentiation paths that allow the generation of specialized cell types [197], often represented as dynamical paths on a Waddington epigenetic landscape (figure 6 c ) [211].”
    BackgroundMethod

Authors
Márquez-Zacarías, P., Pineau, R. M., Gomez, M., Veliz-Cuba, A., Murrugarra, D., Ratcliff, W. C., & Niklas, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Niklas, Karl J.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
49-60
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3081224153
Cited by
46
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ohio State University
  • NSF (DMS-1839810, IOS-1656549, DEB-1845363)
  • Simons Foundation (516088)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
cell differentiation, evolution of multicellularity, Boolean networks, evolutionary transitions, organismal complexity, intercellular communication, model interpretation
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Biological Evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review