The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Understanding how levels of satisfaction differ across transportation modes can be helpful to encourage the use of active as well as public modes of transportation over the use of the automobile. This study uses a large-scale travel survey to compare commuter satisfaction across six modes of transportation (walking, bicycle, automobile, bus, metro, commuter train) and investigates how the determinants of commuter satisfaction differ across modes. The framework guiding this research assumes that external and internal factors influence satisfaction: personal, social, and attitudinal variables must be considered in addition to objective trip characteristics. Using ordinary least square regression technique, we develop six mode-specific models of trip satisfaction that include the same independent variables (trip and travel characteristics, personal characteristics, and travel and mode preferences). We find that pedestrians, train commuters and cyclists are significantly more satisfied than drivers, metro and bus users. We also establish that determinants of satisfaction vary considerably by mode, with modes that are more affected by external factors generally displaying lower levels of satisfaction. Mode preference (need/desire to use other modes) affects satisfaction, particularly for transit users. Perceptions that the commute has value other than arriving at a destination significantly increases satisfaction for all modes. Findings from this study provide a better understanding of determinants of trip satisfaction to transport professionals who are interested in this topic and working on increasing satisfaction among different mode users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings
Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251898 · Cited by 4,736
Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study
Beirão, G., & Sarsfield Cabral, J. A. (2007) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009 · Cited by 1,198
Anable, J. (2005) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.11.004 · Cited by 1,002
Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: Development and test of a measurement tool
Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L. E., & Fujii, S. (2011) · Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2010.11.002 · Cited by 502
Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2007) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916506294032 · Cited by 476
When Transport Geography Meets Social Psychology: Toward a Conceptual Model of Travel Behaviour
Van Acker, V., Van Wee, B., & Witlox, F. (2010) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441640902943453 · Cited by 434
How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport
Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Olsson, L. E., & Fujii, S. (2012) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.02.007 · Cited by 345
Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel
Bergstad, C. J., Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Ettema, D., Friman, M., & Olsson, L. E. (2011) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-010-9283-z · Cited by 336
Sense and the city: exploring the embodied geographies of urban walking
Middleton, J. (2010) · Social & Cultural Geography · doi:10.1080/14649365.2010.497913 · Cited by 333
Enjoyment of commute: A comparison of different transportation modes
Páez, A., & Whalen, K. (2010) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.003 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Martin, A., Goryakin, Y., & Suhrcke, M. (2014) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.023 · Cited by 403
How commuting affects subjective wellbeing
Clark, B., Chatterjee, K., Martin, A., & Davis, A. (2020) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-019-09983-9 · Cited by 331
Singleton, P. A. (2019) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2018.02.005 · Cited by 265
Cohen, M. J. (2021) · Housing, Theory and Society · doi:10.1080/14036096.2020.1722218 · Cited by 127
What drives sustainable student travel? Mode choice determinants in the Greater Toronto Area
Moniruzzaman, M., & Farber, S. (2018) · International Journal of Sustainable Transportation · doi:10.1080/15568318.2017.1377326 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- St-Louis, E., Manaugh, K., van Lierop, D., & El-Geneidy, A.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 160-170
- ISSN
- 1369-8478 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1505511839
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 39.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.004
- The paper
- St-Louis, E., Manaugh, K., van Lierop, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2014). The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.