CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pedestrians’ road crossing decisions and body parts’ movements

Kalantarov, Semyon, Riemer, Raziel, Oron-Gilad, Tal·2018·Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2017.09.012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trf.2017.09.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pedestrians crossing a street increased their walking speed when the time gap between cars was smaller.

    “Kalantarov et al. (2018) found that pedestrians crossing a street increased their walking speed when the time gap between cars was smaller.”

    From Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics? (2019) · cites this paper as Kalantarov et al. (2018)

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Adebisi, 1989, Influence of stopped delay on driver gap acceptance behavior, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 115, 305, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1989)115:3(305) · DOI
  2. Cantillo, 2015, Modelling pedestrian crossing behaviour in urban roads: A latent variable approach, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 56, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.008 · DOI
  3. Dagan, E., Mano, O., Stein, G. P., & Shashua, A. (2004, June). Forward collision warning with a single camera. In Intelligent vehicles symposium, 2004 IEEE (pp. 37–42). IEEE. · DOI
  4. De Leva, 1996, Adjustments to zatsiorsky-seluyanov's segment inertia parameters, Journal of Biomechanics, 29, 1223, 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00178-6 · DOI
  5. Demiroz, 2015, Illegal road crossing behavior of pedestrians at overpass locations: Factors affecting gap acceptance, crossing times and overpass use, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 80, 220, 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.018 · DOI
  6. Dommes, 2014, Crossing a two-way street: Comparison of young and old pedestrians, Journal of Safety Research, 50, 27, 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.03.008 · DOI
  7. Eensoo, 2007, Association of traffic behavior with personality and platelet monoamine oxidase activity in schoolchildren, Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 311, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.011 · DOI
  8. Evans, 2003, Predicting adolescent pedestrians' road-crossing intentions: An application and extension of the theory of planned behaviour, Health Education Research, 18, 267, 10.1093/her/cyf023 · DOI
  9. Guo, 2011, Modeling pedestrian violation behavior at signalized crosswalks in China: A hazards-based duration approach, Traffic Injury Prevention, 12, 96, 10.1080/15389588.2010.518652 · DOI
  10. Guth, 2005, Blind and sighted pedestrians’ judgments of gaps in traffic at roundabouts, Human Factors, 47, 314, 10.1518/0018720054679533 · DOI
  11. Herrero-Fernández, 2016, Risky behavior in young adult pedestrians: Personality determinants, correlates with risk perception, and gender differences, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 36, 14, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.11.007 · DOI
  12. Holland, 2007, The effect of age, gender and driver status on pedestrians’ intentions to cross the road in risky situations, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39, 224, 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.003 · DOI
  13. John, 1999, The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives, Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102
  14. Kadali, 2013, Modelling pedestrian road crossing behaviour under mixed traffic condition, European Transport, 55, 1
  15. Kittleson, 1991, Delay effects on driver gap acceptance characteristics at two-way stop-controlled intersections, Transportation Research Record, 1320, 154
  16. Li, D., Li, Y., & Yuan, X. (2014). Effect of situational factors on pedestrian intention to jaywalk. Paper presented at the 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (pp. 1770–1774). · DOI
  17. Lobjois, 2013, The effects of age and traffic density on street-crossing behavior, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 53, 166, 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.028 · DOI
  18. Marisamynathan, 2016, A new approach to estimate pedestrian delay at signalized intersections, Transport, 1
  19. Meir, 2013, Towards understanding child-pedestrians’ hazard perception abilities in a mixed reality dynamic environment, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 20, 90, 10.1016/j.trf.2013.05.004 · DOI
  20. Morrongiello, 2015, Using a virtual environment to study child pedestrian behaviours: A comparison of parents' expectations and children's street crossing behaviour, Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 21, 291, 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041508 · DOI
  21. Morrongiello, 2015, Using a virtual environment to study pedestrian behaviors: How does time pressure affect children's and adults' street crossing behaviors?, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40, 697, 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv019 · DOI
  22. O'Neal, E. E., Jiang, Y., Franzen, L. J., Rahimian, P., Yon, J. P., Kearney, J. K., & Plumert, J. M. (2017). Changes in perception-action tuning over long time scales: How children and adults perceive and act on dynamic affordances when crossing roads. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human perception and performance.
  23. Oudejans, 1996, To cross or not to cross: The effect of locomotion on street-crossing behavior, Ecological Psychology, 8, 259, 10.1207/s15326969eco0803_4 · DOI
  24. Papadimitriou, 2016, Pedestrian risk taking while road crossing: A comparison of observed and declared behaviour, Transport Research Arena, Warsaw
  25. Plumert, 2011, Changes in children’s perception-action tuning over short time scales: Bicycling across traffic-filled intersections in a virtual environment, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 322, 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.005 · DOI
  26. Rosenbloom, 2003, Risk evaluation and risky behavior of high and low sensation seekers, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31, 375, 10.2224/sbp.2003.31.4.375 · DOI
  27. Rosenbloom, 2015, Hazard perception test for pedestrians, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 79, 160, 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.019 · DOI
  28. Rosenbloom, 2002, Sensation seeking and detection of risky road signals: A developmental perspective, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 34, 569, 10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00054-9 · DOI
  29. Simpson, 2003, An investigation of road crossing in a virtual environment, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35, 787, 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00081-7 · DOI
  30. Sisiopiku, 2003, Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: An examination based on observation and survey data, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6, 249, 10.1016/j.trf.2003.06.001 · DOI
  31. Stevens, 2012, Preadolescent temperament and risky behavior: Bicycling across traffic-filled intersections in a virtual environment, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38, 285, 10.1093/jpepsy/jss116 · DOI
  32. Tapiro, 2015, Towards understanding the influence of environmental distractors on pedestrian behavior, Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2690, 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.659 · DOI
  33. Tapiro, 2016, Cell phone conversations and child pedestrian’s crossing behavior; a simulator study, Safety Science, 89, 36, 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.05.013 · DOI
  34. Yang, 2015, An accelerated failure time model for investigating pedestrian crossing behavior and waiting times at signalized intersections, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 82, 154, 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.036 · DOI
  35. Yang, 2013, Study on pedestrian red-time crossing behavior: Integrated field observation and questionnaire data, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2393, 117, 10.3141/2393-13 · DOI
  36. Yannis, 2013, Pedestrian gap acceptance for mid-block street crossing, Transportation Planning and Technology, 36, 450, 10.1080/03081060.2013.818274 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kalantarov, S., Riemer, R., & Oron-Gilad, T.
ORCID
Kalantarov, Semyon
Venue
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
53
Pages
155-171
ISSN
1369-8478
DOI
10.1016/j.trf.2017.09.012
Cited by
55
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review