Autonomous shared mobility-on-demand: Melbourne pilot simulation study
Open accessAbstract
: This paper presents results from a simulation-based study which aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using agent-based simulation tools to model the impacts of shared autonomous vehicles. First, the paper outlines a research framework for the development and evaluation of low carbon mobility solutions driven by two disruptive forces which are changing the mobility landscape and providing consumers with more choices to meet their transport needs: automated self-driving and on-demand shared mobility services. The focus of this paper is on development of rigorous models for understanding the demand for travel in the age of connected mobility, and assessing their impacts particularly under scenarios of autonomous or self-driving on-demand shared mobility. To demonstrate the feasibility of the approach, the paper provides initial results from a pilot study on a small road network in Melbourne, Australia. A base case scenario representing the current situation of using traditional privately owned vehicles, and two autonomous mobility on-demand (AMoD) scenarios were simulated on a real transport network. In the first scenario (AMoD1), it was assumed that the on-demand vehicles were immediately available to passengers (maximum waiting times is zero). This constraint was relaxed in the second scenario (AMoD2) by increasing the allowable passenger waiting times up to a maximum of 5 minutes. The results showed that using the AMoD system resulted in a significant reduction in both the number of vehicles required to meet the transport needs of the community (reduction of 43% in AMoD1, and 88% in AMoD2), and the required on-street parking space (reduction of 58% in AMoD1 and 83% in AMoD2). However, the simulation also showed that this was achieved at the expense of a less significant increase in the total VKT (increase of 29% in AMoD1 and 10% in AMoD2). The paper concludes by describing how the model is being extended, the remaining challenges that need to be overcome in this research, and outlines the next steps to achieve the desired outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A reduction of up to 83% is estimated for Melbourne.
“Dia & Javanshour (2017) estimate a reduction of up to 83%.”
From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Dia & Javanshour, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Dia, H., 2013. How to Save €300bn a Year. Thinking Highways, 8(3), 74-76.
- Duncan, G., 2010. From Microsimulation to Nanosimulation: Visualizing Person Trips Over Multiple Modes of Transport. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2175(15), 130-137.
- Iaz-González, F., Sumper, A., Gomis-Bellmunt, O., Villafáfila-Robles, R., 2012. A Review of Energy Storage Technologies for Wind Power Applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4), 2154-2171.
- Kitchin, R., 2014. The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1-14.
- Li, Z., Chen, C., Wang, K., 2011. Cloud Computing for Agent-Based Urban Transportation Systems. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 26(1), 73-79.
- Pavone, M., 2015. Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems for Future Urban Mobility, in M Maurer, JC Gerdes, B Lenz., & H Winner (Eds.), Autonomes Fahren, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, available at http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-662-45854-9 [accessed 25 August 2015]. · DOI
- Rigole, P., 2014. Study of a Shared Autonomous Vehicles Based Mobility Solution in Stockholm. Master of Science Thesis, available: http://bit.ly/1Qig7Cu [accessed 25 August 2015].
- Rose, G., 2006. Mobile Phones as Traffic Probes: Practices, Prospects and Issues, Transport Reviews, 26(1), 275-291.
- Shen, W., Lopes, C., 2015. Managing Autonomous Mobility on Demand Systems for Better Passenger Experience. Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. Springer International Publishing., available at http://bit.ly/1nC1WyN [accessed 11 January 2016].
- Wu, X., Zhu, X., Wu, G.Q., Ding, W., 2014. Data Mining With Big Data. Knowledge and Data Engineering. IEEE Transactions on, 26(1), 97- 107.
- Zhang, R., Spieser, K., Frazzoli, E., Pavone, M., 2015. Models, Algorithms, and Evaluation for Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems. American Control Conference, Chicago, IL, USA.
- Zipcar., 2014. Zipcar's Annual Millennial Survey Shows the Kids Are All Right. available at: http://www.zipcar.com/press/releases/fourth- annual-millennial-survey [accessed 3 September 2015].
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review
Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E., & Antoniou, C. (2020) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.008 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
Faisal, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Currie, G. (2019) · Journal of Transport and Land Use · doi:10.5198/jtlu.2019.1405 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dia, H., & Javanshour, F.
- Affiliations
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Dia, Hussein
- ORCID
- Dia, Hussein
- Venue
- Transportation Research Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 285-296
- ISSN
- 2352-1457 (ISSN-L)
- 2352-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2616803378
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Transportation research procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Keywords
- mobility-on-demand, autonomous vehicles, travel demand modeling, agent-based modeling, vehicle kilometers traveled, parking reduction, vehicle fleet size, passenger waiting time, low-carbon transportation, connected mobility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review