Is social support associated with post-transplant medication adherence and outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Although social support is used to determine transplant eligibility, the relationship between social support, medication adherence, and survival among transplant recipients remains unclear. We estimated the relationship between social support and post-transplant medication adherence and outcomes using 10 electronic databases from inception to January 2016. Study quality was assessed and all review stages were conducted independently by 2 reviewers. Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Thirty-two studies (9102 participants) met inclusion criteria: 21 assessed medication adherence (5197 participants), and 13 assessed clinical outcomes (3905 participants). Among high quality studies, neither social support nor marital status was predictive of medication adherence or post-transplant outcomes. Social support was not associated with medication adherence. It was associated with superior post-transplant outcomes, but the relationship was not significant among high quality studies. Compared to unmarried recipients, married recipients were more likely to adhere to medication post-transplant, but this relationship was not significant among high quality studies. Marital status was not significantly associated with transplant success. Social support is weakly and inconsistently associated with post-transplant adherence and outcomes. Larger prospective studies using consistent and validated measures are needed to justify the use of inadequate social support as a contraindication to transplantation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In kidney transplanted patients, adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is of importance to reduce the risk of rejection.
“In kidney transplanted patients, adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is of importance, to reduce the risk of rejection [8].”
From Effectiveness of Expressive Writing in Kidney Transplanted Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
The Results (Medication Adherence; page unavailable) include kidney transplant recipients, and the Discussion (page unavailable) links coping with medication side effects and maintaining the graft. The paper does not state that adherence to immunosuppressive therapy reduces rejection risk specifically in kidney transplant recipients. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 111
- Authors
- Ladin, K., Daniels, A., Osani, M., & Bannuru, R. R.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Tufts Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ladin, Keren
- Venue
- Transplantation Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-28
- ISSN
- 0955-470X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5658266
- OpenAlex
- W2607517897
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Transplantation Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (KL2TR001063)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT009374)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Keywords
- social support, medication adherence, transplant recipients, post-transplant outcomes, survival, marital status, transplant eligibility, organ transplantation
- MeSH terms
- Graft Rejection, Humans, Social Support, Kidney Transplantation, Medication Adherence, Transplant Recipients
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review