Cited by 111Medication Adherence and ComplianceOrgan and Tissue Transplantation ResearchRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Is social support associated with post-transplant medication adherence and outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Ladin, Keren, Daniels, Alexis, Osani, Mikala, Bannuru, Raveendhara R.·2018·Transplantation Reviews

Abstract

Although social support is used to determine transplant eligibility, the relationship between social support, medication adherence, and survival among transplant recipients remains unclear. We estimated the relationship between social support and post-transplant medication adherence and outcomes using 10 electronic databases from inception to January 2016. Study quality was assessed and all review stages were conducted independently by 2 reviewers. Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Thirty-two studies (9102 participants) met inclusion criteria: 21 assessed medication adherence (5197 participants), and 13 assessed clinical outcomes (3905 participants). Among high quality studies, neither social support nor marital status was predictive of medication adherence or post-transplant outcomes. Social support was not associated with medication adherence. It was associated with superior post-transplant outcomes, but the relationship was not significant among high quality studies. Compared to unmarried recipients, married recipients were more likely to adhere to medication post-transplant, but this relationship was not significant among high quality studies. Marital status was not significantly associated with transplant success. Social support is weakly and inconsistently associated with post-transplant adherence and outcomes. Larger prospective studies using consistent and validated measures are needed to justify the use of inadequate social support as a contraindication to transplantation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trre.2017.04.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In kidney transplanted patients, adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is of importance to reduce the risk of rejection.

    “In kidney transplanted patients, adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is of importance, to reduce the risk of rejection [8].”

    From Effectiveness of Expressive Writing in Kidney Transplanted Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study (2022) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Results (Medication Adherence; page unavailable) include kidney transplant recipients, and the Discussion (page unavailable) links coping with medication side effects and maintaining the graft. The paper does not state that adherence to immunosuppressive therapy reduces rejection risk specifically in kidney transplant recipients. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 111

Authors
Ladin, K., Daniels, A., Osani, M., & Bannuru, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ladin, Keren
Venue
Transplantation Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
16-28
ISSN
0955-470X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2607517897
Cited by
111
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transplantation Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR001063)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT009374)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Keywords
social support, medication adherence, transplant recipients, post-transplant outcomes, survival, marital status, transplant eligibility, organ transplantation
MeSH terms
Graft Rejection, Humans, Social Support, Kidney Transplantation, Medication Adherence, Transplant Recipients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review