Towards active community participation in dengue vector control: results from action research in Santiago de Cuba, Cuba
Abstract
Community participation is advocated as essential for attaining effective dengue prevention, but knowledge of how to foster this is limited. In Santiago de Cuba, multiple small task forces were created at the neighbourhood level that included all stakeholders in the control of Aedes aegypti. The task forces assessed the perceived needs and elaborated action plans to promote specific behavioural change and to reduce environmental risks through social communication strategies and intersectoral local government activities. We monitored five dimensions of the participation process and assessed behavioural and environmental results and entomological outcomes. Participation was weak to good. At the household level, uncovered water storage containers decreased from 49.3% to 2.6% between 2000 and 2002, and removing larvicide from them dropped from 45.5% to 1%. There was a reduction of 75% in the absolute number of positive containers and a significant decrease from 1.23% to 0.35% in the house index. Local task forces, in which the interests of householders as well as vector control workers are directly represented, can lead to effective government-community partnerships that resolve problems of mutual concern.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empowerment strategies have been reported as effective for community-based dengue prevention and control in Cuba and elsewhere.
“Empowerment strategies have been reported as effective for community-based dengue prevention and control in Cuba [51–55] and elsewhere [56–58].”
From A modified theoretical framework to assess implementation fidelity of adaptive public health interventions (2015) · cites this paper as [51]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 114
- Authors
- Toledo, M. E., Vanlerberghe, V., Baly, A., Ceballos, E., Valdes, L., Searret, M., Boelaert, M., & Van der Stuyft, P.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Medicina Tropical “Pedro Kourí” (CU)
- Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde (BE)
- Venue
- Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-63
- ISSN
- 0035-9203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971849203
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 22.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Keywords
- dengue vector control, community participation, Aedes aegypti, government-community collaboration, behavior change, household water storage, larvicides, house index, social communication strategies, Santiago de Cuba
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Community Health Services, Cuba, Dengue, Humans, Insect Vectors, Mosquito Control, Patient Participation, Health Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review