Personality and boredom proneness in the prediction of creativity and curiosity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals who are more prone to boredom tend to seek novel and exciting experiences.
“According to the sensation-seeking theory, individuals who are more prone to boredom tend to seek novel and exciting experiences (Hunter et al., 2016).”
From The effect of short-form video addiction on undergraduates' academic procrastination: a moderated mediation model (2023) · cites this paper as Hunter et al., 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Hunter, J. A., Abraham, E. H., Hunter, A. G., Goldberg, L. C., & Eastwood, J. D.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hunter, Jennifer A.
- ORCID
- Hunter, Jennifer A.
- Venue
- Thinking Skills and Creativity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 48-57
- ISSN
- 1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2512790900
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Thinking Skills and Creativity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- boredom proneness, creativity, curiosity, HEXACO personality, openness to experience, personality traits, state boredom
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
