Direct comparison of low-dose and Cornell-like models of chronic and reactivation tuberculosis in genetically susceptible I/St and resistant B6 mice
Abstract
We applied the low-dose challenge (chronic) and reactivation following chemotherapy withdrawal (Cornell-like) TB models to mouse strains with genetically different susceptibility to and severity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-triggered disease. Systemic infection caused by intravenous (i.v.) administration of approximately 70 cfus of M. tuberculosis H37Rv lead to chronic, persistent, non-lethal disease in genetically resistant B6 mice, but resulted in a fatal pathological process in the lungs of susceptible I/St animals. Thus, application of the identical experimental approach to genetically different murine hosts allows investigating both slowly progressive disease with the fatal outcome (I/St) and chronic life-span disease (B6). Under Cornell-like model conditions, both temporary eradication of cultivable bacilli from lungs and spleens due to chemotherapy and their re-appearance in organs following its withdrawal were demonstrated in mice of both strains. However, (i) reactivation occurred significantly earlier in I/St than in B6 mice; (ii) I/St mice survived not more than 6 month following chemotherapy withdrawal and demonstrated 100% TB relapse, whereas in B6 mice mortality did not exceed 50%, and no mycobacteria were recovered from some animals. I/St mice, with their genetically determined high TB severity, provide a more reliable tool for modeling TB relapse after chemotherapy withdrawal than mice of more resistant strains.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
C57BL/6Cit and I/StSnEgYCit mice are extremely susceptible to tuberculosis.
“C57BL/6Cit and I/StSnEgYCit mice, which are extremely susceptible to tuberculosis [33].”
From Untranslated Region Sequences and the Efficacy of mRNA Vaccines against Tuberculosis (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Untranslated Region Sequences and the Efficacy of mRNA Vaccines against Tuberculosis
Reshetnikov, V., Terenin, I., Shepelkova, G., Yeremeev, V., Kolmykov, S., Nagornykh, M., Kolosova, E., Sokolova, T., Zaborova, O., Kukushkin, I., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25020888 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Radaeva, T. V., Nikonenko, B. V., Mischenko, V. V., Averbakh, M. M., & Apt, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Central Scientific Research Institute of Tuberculosis Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (RU)
- Sequella (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Apt, A.S.
- ORCID
- Apt, A.S.
- Venue
- Tuberculosis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 65-72
- ISSN
- 1472-9792 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041996396
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tuberculosis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL068532, R01 HL 68532-02)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
- Keywords
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, chronic tuberculosis, tuberculosis reactivation, tuberculosis relapse, C57BL/6 mice, mouse strain differences, intravenous challenge, disease severity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Bacterial, Antitubercular Agents, Chronic Disease, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Immunity, Innate, Lung, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Species Specificity, Spleen, Tuberculosis, Colony Count, Microbial, Cytokines, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review