Socio-ecological dynamics and inequality in Bogotá, Colombia's public urban forests and their ecosystem services
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Urban planning in LAC has historically been hindered by ineffective governance, weak regulatory structures, lack of transparency, and a focus on economic and political concerns where the needs of the private sector are prioritized, often at the cost of urban green spaces.
“For example, urban planning in LAC has historically been hindered by ineffective governance, weak regulatory structures, lack of transparency, and a focus on economic and political concerns where the needs of the private sector are prioritized, often at the cost of urban green spaces (124, 125).”
From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [125]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 137
- Authors
- Escobedo, F. J., Clerici, N., Staudhammer, C. L., & Corzo, G. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Universidad del Rosario (CO)
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clerici, Nicola
- Venue
- Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1040-1053
- ISSN
- 1610-8167 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-8667
- OpenAlex
- W2172613103
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 20.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Urban forestry & urban greening (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Keywords
- urban forests, ecosystem services, socioeconomic disparities, spatial equity, urban trees, tree species diversity, carbon stocks, particulate matter removal, property values, land use, environmental justice, urban planning, Bogotá
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review