Critical review on the cooling effect of urban blue-green space: A threshold-size perspective
Open accessAbstract
The cooling effect of blue-green space has been recognized as a promising approach to mitigate the urban heat island (UHI), while the quantitative role (threshold-size for cooling) is still uncertain. This paper aims to present the latest progress and controversies on the studies of the cooling effects of waterbodies, greenspaces, and parks. In order to do this research, international search engines were employed to systematically search peer-reviewed articles, including the cooling effect of blue-green space and threshold-size-based UHI mitigation studies. After that, the inductive analysis is used to analyze the relevant literature. We found that previous studies concentrated on the correlations between different landscape types, temperature variations and the quantification of cooling intensity, etc. However, threshold-size-based research has received less attention, which limits the ability to make specific recommendations for actionable planning and management – usingthe smallest blue-green space for the best cooling effect. The review also revealed the controversies over the effects of blue-green space size, shape, landscape composition and configuration on cooling effect. Besides, we pointed out that the uncertainties (i.e., the optimal proportion of blue-green space in a park) and the reasons of controversial results of the cooling effect need to be further investigated. We also suggested that more attention should be paid to quantify the contributions of local background climate and landscape characteristics to the cooling effect (threshold-size) of blue-green space. This review would give us a deeper understanding of the field and provide insights into actionable climate adaption planning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Outdoor urban shadings from buildings, trees, and umbrellas or shade covers can instigate cooling effects.
“Outdoor urban shadings from buildings, trees, and umbrellas/shade covers can also instigate cooling effects [83,85].”
From Heatwaves in South Asia: Characterization, Consequences on Human Health, and Adaptation Strategies (2022) · cites this paper as [83]
Cites
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272 · see citing works
Lewis, S. L., & Maslin, M. A. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14258 · Cited by 3,441 · see citing works
The urban south and the predicament of global sustainability
Nagendra, H., Bai, X., Brondizio, E. S., & Lwasa, S. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0101-5 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Völker, S., & Kistemann, T. (2015) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.10.015 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heatwaves in South Asia: Characterization, Consequences on Human Health, and Adaptation Strategies
Sharma, A., Andhikaputra, G., & Wang, Y.-C. (2022) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos13050734 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Review of heat wave studies and related urban policies in South Asia
Kotharkar, R., & Ghosh, A. (2021) · Urban Climate · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100777 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Chu, S., Xu, W., Zhang, D., Lin, J., Liu, J., Liu, S., & Hong, X.-C. (2026) · Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering · doi:10.1080/13467581.2025.2481238 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“The health benefits of urban blue and green spaces have been reviewed by many scholars (Labib, Lindley, and Huck 2020; Zhou et al. 2024), including aspects such as combating anxiety and depression (Bray et al. 2022) and cooling effects (Yu et al. 2020).”
- Authors
- Yu, Z., Yang, G., Zuo, S., Jørgensen, G., Koga, M., & Vejre, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Sojo University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Zhaowu
- Venue
- Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 49
- Pages
- 126630
- ISSN
- 1610-8167 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-8667
- OpenAlex
- W3005195542
- Cited by
- 700
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 103 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 20
- FWCI
- 25.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Urban forestry & urban greening (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of California Berkeley
- Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration (SHUES2019A01)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP 17H01948)
- Københavns Universitet
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41471150, 41922007)
- China Scholarship Council (201504910797)
- State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- urban blue-green spaces, urban heat island mitigation, cooling effect, threshold size, water bodies, urban parks, landscape configuration, landscape composition, cooling intensity, climate adaptation planning, urban climate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review