The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sizing of flaws using ultrasonic bulk wave testing: A review
Abstract
Ultrasonic testing is a non-destructive method that can be used to detect, locate and size flaws. The purpose of this paper is to review techniques that utilise ultrasonic bulk waves to size flaws. Flaws that are embedded within a component (i.e. remote from any surface) as well as flaws growing from inaccessible surfaces are considered. The different available techniques are grouped into the following categories: amplitude, temporal, imaging and inversion. The principles, applications and limitations of the different techniques are covered, as well as approaches to assessing the performance of the techniques. Finally, remaining gaps and challenges in sizing flaws, particularly in an industrial setting, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Cited by
Nsengiyumva, W., Zhong, S., Lin, J., Zhang, Q., Zhong, J., & Huang, Y. (2021) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112951 · Cited by 325
Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures: A Comprehensive Review
Hassani, S., Mousavi, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22010153 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Felice, M. V., & Fan, Z.
- Venue
- Ultrasonics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 88
- Pages
- 26-42
- ISSN
- 0041-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789817856
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sizing of flaws using ultrasonic bulk wave testing: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ultras.2018.03.003
- The paper
- Felice, M. V., & Fan, Z. (2018). Sizing of flaws using ultrasonic bulk wave testing: A review. Ultrasonics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2018.03.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
