Sinoporphyrin sodium triggered sono-photodynamic effects on breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo
Open accessAbstract
Sono-photodynamic therapy (SPDT) is a promising anti-cancer strategy. Briefly, SPDT combines ultrasound and light to activate sensitizers that produce mechanical, sonochemical and photochemical activities. Sinoporphyrin sodium (DVDMS) is a newly identified sensitizer that shows great potential in both sonodynamic therapy (SDT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT). In this study, we primarily evaluated the combined effects of SDT and PDT by using DVDMS on breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, DVDMS-SPDT elicits much serious cytotoxicity compared with either SDT or PDT alone by MTT and colony formation assays. 2',7'-Dichlorodihydrofluo-rescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA) and dihydroethidium (DHE) staining revealed that intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) were significantly increased in groups given combined therapy. Terephthalic acid (TA) method and FD500-uptake assay reflected that cavitational effects and cell membrane permeability changes after ultrasound irradiation were also involved in the enhancement of combination therapy. In vivo, DVDMS-SPDT markedly inhibits the tumor volume and tumor weight growth. Hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry analysis show DVDMS-SPDT greatly suppressed tumor proliferation. Further, DVDMS-SPDT significantly inhibits tumor lung metastasis in the highly metastatic 4T1 mouse xenograft model, which is consistent well with the in vitro findings evaluated by transwell assay. Moreover, DVDMS-SPDT did not produces obvious effect on body weight and major organs in 4T1 xenograft model. The results suggest that by combination SDT and PDT, the sensitizer DVDMS would produce much better therapeutic effects, and DVDMS-SPDT may be a potential strategy against highly metastatic breast cancer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 4T1-bearing mice, tumor weight inhibition rates of SDT alone and PDT alone were 46.66% and 55.54%, respectively, while SPDT and photodynamic and sonodynamic therapy were 81.45% and 84.83%, respectively.
“In 4T1-bearing mice, the tumor weight inhibition rates of SDT (1.9 MHz, 1.6 Wcm−2, 3 min) and PDT (635 nm, 417 mWcm−2, 2 min, final light dose of 50 Jcm−2) alone were 46.66% and 55.54%, respectively. However, the tumor weight inhibition rates of SPDT and photodynamic and sonodynamic therapy were 81.45% and 84.83%, respectively”
From Nanosensitizer-assisted sonodynamic therapy for breast cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [108]
The effect was further enhanced when PDT and SDT were combined.
“indicating that the effect was further enhanced when these two therapies were combined (Fig. 8A, B) [108].”
From Nanosensitizer-assisted sonodynamic therapy for breast cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [108]
Cites
Wang, P., Li, C., Wang, X., Xiong, W., Feng, X., Liu, Q., Leung, A. W., & Xu, C. (2015) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.10.027 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sonodynamic Therapy: Advances and Challenges in Clinical Translation
Lafond, M., Yoshizawa, S., & Umemura, S. (2019) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.14733 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Nanosensitizer-assisted sonodynamic therapy for breast cancer
Yu, J., Hu, J.-R., Tian, Y., Lei, Y.-M., Hu, H.-M., Lei, B.-S., Zhang, G., Sun, Y., & Ye, H.-R. (2025) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03311-3 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Wang, P., Liu, Q., & Wang, X.
- Affiliations
- Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Pan
- Wang, Xiaobing
- Venue
- Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 31
- Pages
- 437-448
- ISSN
- 1350-4177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2273248348
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2022-08-01)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ultrasonics Sonochemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472846, 81571834)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (GK201502009)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
- Keywords
- sono-photodynamic therapy, breast cancer, sonodynamic therapy, photodynamic therapy, reactive oxygen species, cell membrane permeability, metastasis, 4T1 xenograft, tumor growth inhibition, combination therapy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Photochemotherapy, Porphyrins, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review