Cited by 145

Characterization of heat-stable whey protein: Impact of ultrasound on rheological, thermal, structural and morphological properties

Khatkar, Anju Boora, Kaur, Amarjeet, Khatkar, Sunil Kumar, Mehta, Nitin·2018·Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

Abstract

Ultrasound, an emerging non-thermal technique, has potential to modify the functionality of bio-molecules like protein. In the present study, the impact of ultrasound on whey protein (WP) was assessed with functional, rheological, heat coagulation and transition temperature, SDS-PAGE, FTIR spectra, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The results of this study showed that the raw WP had broad bimodal particle size distribution while after ultrasonication, modified WP exhibited narrower distribution along with smaller particle size (0.683 ± 0.225 μm) compared to untreated WP (2.453 ± 0.717 μm). The solubility of WP also increased after ultrasonication (72.22 ± 0.68% to 79.21 ± 1.08%). During the rheological evaluation, both the samples exhibited Newtonian behaviour but, the modified WP exhibited dramatically higher storage modulus (G') throughout the temperature profile compared to raw WP mainly due to enhanced proteins aggregation during heating which revealed more elastic and stronger gel. The modified WP exhibited significantly higher (about 6-times) heat stability compared to raw WP which signified that after ultrasonication the WP can withstand higher temperature during processing for longer time. The results were also confirmed by higher transition temperature (T peak ) of modified WP (93.32°) compared to untreated WP (81.93 °C). The SDS-PAGE profile of raw and modified WP showed that the ultrasound significantly decreased the bands density…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.08.026

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khatkar, A. B., Kaur, A., Khatkar, S. K., & Mehta, N.
Venue
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
49
Pages
333-342
ISSN
1350-4177
Cited by
145
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Punjab Agricultural University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review