Thermosonication-induced structural changes and solution properties of mung bean protein
Abstract
Mung bean protein is considered a highly nutritive food ingredient, but its solution properties are not well defined. In this study, suspensions of mung bean protein isolate (MPI, 10%, w/v) were subjected to high intensity ultrasound (20 kHz, 30% amplitude) at varied durations (5, 10, 20, and 30 min) with controlled temperatures (30, 50, and 70 °C) to determine the effects of thermosonication treatment on physical properties of the protein solution. Results showed that thermosonication treatment significantly reduced the particle size and free sulfhydryl content of MPI in a time-dependent manner. Ultrasound increased surface hydrophobicity, and the exposure of nonpolar groups led to the formation of soluble aggregates. Changes in secondary structure of MPI were minimal at 30 and 50 °C but were significant at 70 °C. The dissociation of native components followed by reaggregation into soluble particles following ultrasound treatment at 70 °C resulted in remarkable improvements of protein solubility (>2 fold), clarity, and stability of the MPI suspensions. The findings indicated that thermosonication could be a promising technology for the processing of mung bean protein beverage.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cavitation shear forces disrupted weakly bound micron-scale agglomerates, increasing the abundance of soluble aggregates and improving protein dispersion and detectability.
“suggesting that cavitation shear forces disrupted weakly bound micron-scale ag glomerates, consistent with the particle size distribution results, while increasing the abundance of soluble aggregates, thereby improving protein dispersion and detectability (Zhong et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2025).”
From Effects of ultrasonication on structure and gelation of plant proteins at different denaturation states (2027) · cites this paper as Zhong et al., 2020
The higher CD signal intensity suggests enhanced protein dissolution and increased exposure of chromophoric groups following ultrasonication.
“suggesting enhanced protein dissolution and increased exposure of chromophoric groups following ultrasonication”
From Effects of ultrasonication on structure and gelation of plant proteins at different denaturation states (2027) · cites this paper as Zhong et al., 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current insights into protein solubility: A review of its importance for alternative proteins
Grossmann, L., & McClements, D. J. (2023) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108416 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Mozafarpour, R., Koocheki, A., Sani, M. A., McClements, D. J., & Mehr, H. M. (2022) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2022.102768 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Recent advances in mung bean protein: From structure, function to application.
Huang, Z., Li, Y., Fan, M., Qian, H., & Wang, L. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133210 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Zhu, M., Kasapis, S., & Dhital, S. (2027) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2026.113251
- Authors
- Zhong, Z., & Xiong, Y. L.
- Venue
- Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 104908
- ISSN
- 1350-4177
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review