Cited by 70Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsRenal cell carcinoma treatmentHormonal Regulation and Hypertension

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal masses: does size matter?

Castillo, Octavio A., Vitagliano, Gonzalo, Secin, Fernando P., Kerkebe, Marcelo, Arellano, Leonardo·2008·Urology

Abstract

Objectives To examine the impact of adrenal tumor size on perioperative morbidity and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy.Methods A total of 227 laparoscopic adrenalectomies were divided in three groups according to size as estimated by pathologic specimen maximum diameter: less than 6 cm (group 1, n = 140), between 6 and 7.9 cm (group 2, n = 47), and equal to or larger than 8 cm (group 3, n = 40). We prospectively recorded and analyzed clinical and pathologic data.Results Average operative time was 60 minutes (range, 50 to 90 minutes) for group 1, 75 minutes (range, 65 to 105 minutes) for group 2, and 80 minutes (range, 65 to 120 minutes) for group 3. Estimated blood loss, median (interquartile range) was 50 mL (range, 20 to 100 mL), 100 mL (range, 48 to 225 mL), and 100 mL (range, 50 to 475 mL) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. We observed a total of 10, 4, and 4 complications in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Average hospital stay was 2 days (range, 2 to 3 days), 2 days (range, 2 to 3 days), and 3 days (range, 2 to 4 days), respectively, for groups 1, 2, and 3. Operative time, average blood loss, and mean hospital stay were significantly higher (P <or=0.05) for group 3 compared with group 1.Conclusions Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in large adrenal masses (8 cm or greater) is associated with significantly longer operative time, increased blood loss, and longer hospital stay, without affecting perioperative morbidity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LA may be technically feasible even for large tumors.

    “although LA may be technically feasible (even for large tumors) (263, 264)”

    From Adrenocortical carcinoma (2014) · cites this paper as [263]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 70

Authors
Castillo, O. A., Vitagliano, G., Secin, F. P., Kerkebe, M., & Arellano, L.
Affiliations
  • Clinica Santa Maria (CL)
  • University of Chile (CL)
Corresponding author
Castillo, Octavio A.
Venue
Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
1138-1141
ISSN
0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093201537
Cited by
70
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Keywords
laparoscopic adrenalectomy, adrenal mass, adrenal tumor size, perioperative morbidity, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative outcomes
MeSH terms
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adrenalectomy, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review