Cited by 50Urinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchPelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic Prostatitis and/or Chronic Pelvic Pain as a Psychoneuromuscular Disorder—A Meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective To evaluate effectiveness of physical therapy, biofeedback, and/or cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP and/or CPPS). This symptom complex has resisted resolution from conventional urologic treatment of the prostate, which includes antibiotics, alpha-blockers, and analgesics. Beginning in 1995, a new paradigm was introduced viewing CP and/or CPPS as a psychoneuromuscular disorder driven by protective pelvic floor guarding and psychosocial stress.Methods A literature search (PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochran Library) was conducted from inception through December 2017 using key words related to CP and/or CPPS (eg, prostatitis and pelvic pain) with physical therapy (eg, myofascial trigger point release) and/or biofeedback or cognitive behavioral treatment. Studies were required to include pre- and post-treatment with the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (CPSI) scores.Results Eight studies inclusive of 280 patients met primary inclusion criteria. Study sample sizes ranged from 8 to 116 men (mean = 35); treatment duration ranged from 8 to 26 weeks (mean = 14). Pretreatment mean CPSI scores ranged from 21.7 to 33.5. The nonstandardized weighted mean reduction of CPSI score from baseline was 8.8 points; 95% confidence interval (7.5, 11.1); P <.001. The I 2 statistic = 18.5% indicating little heterogeneity between studies. A sensitivity analysis including an additional multimodal intervention study of with 100 patients produced similar findings.Conclusion Conventional medical treatment often fails to resolve CP and/or CPPS. A 6-point reduction in CPSI score is considered a clinically meaningful improvement of symptoms. This meta-analysis shows that treating CP and/or CPPS as a psychoneuromuscular disorder can significantly exceed this clinical threshold.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.022

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 50

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, R. U., Wise, D., & Nathanson, B. H.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Rodney U.
Venue
Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
120
Pages
23-29
ISSN
0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884475019
Cited by
50
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
chronic prostatitis, physiotherapy, biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index, psychosocial stress
MeSH terms
Biofeedback, Psychology, Chronic Disease, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Prostatitis, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Pain, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review