The DOI matches its Crossref record.
First Report of Testicular Replantation Following Wrong-Site Surgery
Abstract
Testicular replantation represents a unique circumstance. There are very few reports documenting their experience with testicle replantation and to the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first case that has been reported in the peer-reviewed literature following a wrong site surgery. Therefore, we detail our technique and outcome when faced with such a rare event. In addition we review the literature, in order to compare and report the experience of others. This case highlights the value of applied microsurgical knowledge and the importance of cross-disciplinary efforts to improve patient outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Laterality errors have the potential to cause patient disability or even death, such as removing a patient’s only functioning kidney [11], performing a wrong-side amputation [12], or removal of the healthy, cancer-free testicle [13].”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Mehtsun, 2013, Surgical never events in the United States, Surgery, 153, 465, 10.1016/j.surg.2012.10.005 · DOI
- Rodríguez Costa, 1978, [Traumatic amputation of the testicle. Successful reimplantation using microsurgery (author's transl)], An Esp Pediatr, 11, 865
- Abbou, 1979, [Reimplantation of the penis and both testicles after complete auto-castration. Review of the literature around a case (author's transl)], Chir Memoires Acad Chir, 105, 354
- Kangesu, 1995, Replantation of testis and penis in a child, Lancet Lond Engl, 345, 1368, 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92567-8 · DOI
- Griffiths, 2003, 5-year follow-up of replantation of penis and testis in a child, Lancet Lond Engl, 361, 263, 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12302-1 · DOI
- Darewicz, 1996, Microsurgical replantation of the amputated penis and scrotum in a 29-year-old man, Urol Int, 57, 197, 10.1159/000282912 · DOI
- Gałek, 2002, Microsurgical replantation of sexual organs in three patients, Scand J Urol Nephrol, 36, 14, 10.1080/003655902317259300 · DOI
- Lin, 1985, Replantation of the testis by microsurgical technique, Plast Reconstr Surg, 76, 620, 10.1097/00006534-198510000-00027 · DOI
- Shioshvili, 1987, A case of successful replantation of testis after autohemicastration, Eur Urol, 13, 285, 10.1159/000472797 · DOI
- Xu, 1988, Replantation of the testis: report of a case, J Urol, 139, 596, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42539-0 · DOI
- Altarac, 1993, A case of testicle replantation, J Urol, 150, 1507, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35828-7 · DOI
- Becker, 1997, Replantation of the complete external genitals, Plast Reconstr Surg, 99, 1165, 10.1097/00006534-199704000-00041 · DOI
- Flores, 2007, Nonextremity replantation: the management of amputations of the facial parts and testicle, Clin Plast Surg, 34, 197, 10.1016/j.cps.2006.10.002 · DOI
- Ramdas, 2007, Temporary ectopic testicular replantation, refabrication and orthotopic transfer, J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS, 60, 700, 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.01.074 · DOI
- Ward, 2010, Threatened fertility and gonadal function after a polytraumatic, life-threatening injury, J Emerg Trauma Shock, 3, 199, 10.4103/0974-2700.62110 · DOI
- Liu, 2020, Microscopic replantation of completely amputated penis and testes: a case report and literature review, Int Urol Nephrol, 52, 1271, 10.1007/s11255-020-02407-z · DOI
- Sharp, 2013, Testicular torsion: diagnosis, evaluation, and management, Am Fam Physician, 88, 835
- Turner, 2005, Experimental testicular torsion: reperfusion blood flow and subsequent testicular venous plasma testosterone concentrations, Urology, 65, 390, 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.033 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weng, K.-H., Chou, Y.-C., Kuo, Y.-T., Hsieh, T.-J., & Liu, C.-F. (2025) · JMIR formative research · doi:10.2196/76384
“Laterality errors have the potential to cause patient disability or even death, such as removing a patient’s only functioning kidney [11], performing a wrong-side amputation [12], or removal of the healthy, cancer-free testicle [13].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuncer, F. B., Frautschi, R. S., Lundy, S. D., Haber, G.-P., & Gastman, B.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Venue
- Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 164
- Pages
- 267-272
- ISSN
- 0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210567549
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Urology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Testicular diseases and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Keywords
- wrong-site surgery, testicular damage, microsurgery, surgical technique, patient safety, interdisciplinary collaboration
- MeSH terms
- Amputation, Traumatic, Humans, Male, Microsurgery, Replantation, Testis, Medical Errors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First Report of Testicular Replantation Following Wrong-Site Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.urology.2021.11.044
- The paper
- Tuncer, F. B., Frautschi, R. S., Lundy, S. D., Haber, G.-P., & Gastman, B. (2022). First Report of Testicular Replantation Following Wrong-Site Surgery. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.11.044