Cited by 128Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Control without separate controls: evaluation of vaccine safety using case-only methods

Farrington, C.P·2004·Vaccine

Abstract

Epidemiological methods involving only cases are reviewed in the context of vaccine safety studies. These methods include some ecological methods, case-coverage methods, case-crossover and self-controlled case series methods. The properties of the methods are described using examples from the literature. It is argued that such methods, and in particular the self-controlled case series method, are powerful epidemiologic tools meriting the same attention as more traditional cohort and case-control methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.01.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review used a classification and methodological quality checklist for case-only design studies, developed by CP Farrington and TO Jefferson and adapted from Farrington 2004.

    “We used a classification and methodological quality checklist (unpublished) for case-only design studies, especially developed by CP Farrington and TO Jefferson and adapted from a paper by CP Farrington (Farrington 2004).”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Farrington 2004

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 128

Authors
Farrington, C. P.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
22
Issue
15-16
Pages
2064-2070
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115739016
Cited by
128
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
vaccine safety, self-controlled case series, case-crossover, ecological methods, vaccine adverse events
MeSH terms
Ecology, Epidemiologic Methods, Follow-Up Studies, Health Promotion, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Research Design, Vaccines, Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine, Case-Control Studies, Immunization Programs, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review