The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards an RTS,S-based, multi-stage, multi-antigen vaccine against falciparum malaria: progress at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Abstract
The goal of the Malaria Vaccine Program at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) is to develop a licensed multi-antigen, multi-stage vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum able to prevent all symptomatic manifestations of malaria by preventing parasitemia. A secondary goal is to limit disease in vaccinees that do develop malaria. Malaria prevention will be achieved by inducing humoral and cellular immunity against the pre-erythrocytic circumsporozoite protein (CSP) and the liver stage antigen-1 (LSA-1). The strategy to limit disease will target immune responses against one or more blood stage antigens, merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1) and apical merozoite antigen-1 (AMA-1). The induction of T- and B-cell memory to achieve a sustained vaccine response may additionally require immunization with an adenovirus vector such as adenovirus serotype 35. RTS,S, a CSP-derived antigen developed by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals in collaboration with the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research over the past 17 years, is the cornerstone of our program. RTS,S formulated in AS02A (a GSK proprietary formulation) is the only vaccine candidate shown in field trials to prevent malaria and, in one instance, to limit disease severity. Our vaccine development plan requires proof of an individual antigen's efficacy in a Phase 2 laboratory challenge or field trial prior to its integration into an RTS,S-based, multi-antigen vaccine. Progress has been accelerated through extensive partnerships with industrial, academic, governmental, and non-governmental organizations. Recent safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy trials in the US and Africa are presented, as well as plans for the development of a multi-antigen vaccine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stoute, J. A., Slaoui, M., Heppner, D. G., Momin, P., Kester, K. E., Desmons, P., Wellde, B. T., Garçon, N., Krzych, U., Marchand, M., et al. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199701093360202 · Cited by 870
Self-citationAdenoviruses as vaccine vectors
Tatsis, N., & Ertl, H. C. J. (2004) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.07.013 · Cited by 669
Cited by
Multifunctional TH1 cells define a correlate of vaccine-mediated protection against Leishmania major
Darrah, P. A., Patel, D. T., De Luca, P. M., Lindsay, R. W. B., Davey, D. F., Flynn, B. J., Hoff, S. T., Andersen, P., Reed, S. G., Morris, S. L., et al. (2007) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1592 · Cited by 1,378
King, L. D. W., Pulido, D., Barrett, J. R., Davies, H., Quinkert, D., Lias, A. M., Silk, S. E., Pattinson, D. J., Diouf, A., Williams, B. G., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101654 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- HEPPNERJR, D., KESTER, K., OCKENHOUSE, C., TORNIEPORTH, N., OFORI, O., LYON, J., STEWART, V, DUBOIS, P., LANAR, D., & KRZYCH, U.
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-03-18
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 17-18
- Pages
- 2243-2250
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974245401
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards an RTS,S-based, multi-stage, multi-antigen vaccine against falciparum malaria: progress at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.142
- The paper
- HEPPNERJR, D., KESTER, K., OCKENHOUSE, C., TORNIEPORTH, N., OFORI, O., LYON, J., STEWART, V, DUBOIS, P., LANAR, D., & KRZYCH, U. (2005). Towards an RTS,S-based, multi-stage, multi-antigen vaccine against falciparum malaria: progress at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.