Cited by 39Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Potential effects of decreased cervical cancer screening participation after HPV vaccination: An example from the U.S.

Kulasingam, Shalini L., Pagliusi, Sonia, Myers, Evan·2007·Vaccine

Abstract

A concern with widespread implementation of HPV vaccination programs is that women may mistakenly decide that they do not need to be screened any longer, and thus be less likely to participate in cervical cancer screening, because they view themselves to be at low-risk of developing cervical cancer. We hypothesized that non-participation in screening among vaccinated young women in the 5 years following vaccination may result in missed CIN 2-3 cases that could progress to cancer. For instance, if 50% fewer women 26-30 years old, who were vaccinated, participate in screening in the United States over a 5 year time horizon, there would be approximately 4 women (per 1000) with missed CIN 2-3. On the other hand, non-participation will reduce the number of false-positive screening test results, as non-participation would avoid approximately 27 false-positive test results, with a decrease in follow-up procedures and costs. These results highlight the importance of educating women to ensure continued screening, as well as the need to consider new approaches to screening in the era of vaccination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.09.035

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Kulasingam, S. L., Pagliusi, S., & Myers, E.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Kulasingam, Shalini L.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
25
Issue
48
Pages
8110-8113
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008234139
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, HPV vaccination, screening uptake, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, missed diagnosis, false-positive screening results, young women, screening follow-up, screening costs, health education
MeSH terms
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Public Health, United States, Vaccination, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review