The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rabies control in rural Africa: Evaluating strategies for effective domestic dog vaccination
Open accessAbstract
Effective vaccination campaigns need to reach a sufficient percentage of the population to eliminate disease and prevent future outbreaks, which for rabies is predicted to be 70%, at a cost that is economically and logistically sustainable. Domestic dog rabies has been increasing across most of sub-Saharan Africa indicating that dog vaccination programmes to date have been inadequate. We compare the effectiveness of a variety of dog vaccination strategies in terms of their cost and coverage in different community settings in rural Tanzania. Central-point (CP) vaccination was extremely effective in agro-pastoralist communities achieving a high coverage (>80%) at a low cost (US$5/dog) and inadequate (<20% coverage); combined approaches using CP and either house-to-house vaccination or trained community-based animal health workers were most effective with coverage exceeding 70%, although costs were still high (>US$6 and >US$4/dog, respectively). No single vaccination strategy is likely to be effective in all populations and therefore alternative approaches must be deployed under different settings. CP vaccination is cost-effective and efficient for the majority of dog populations in rural Tanzania and potentially elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa, whereas a combination strategy is necessary in remote pastoralist communities. These results suggest that rabies control is logistically feasible across most of the developing world and that the annual costs of effective vaccination campaigns in Tanzania are likely to be affordable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Feasibility of Canine Rabies Elimination in Africa: Dispelling Doubts with Data
Lembo, T., Hampson, K., Kaare, M. T., Ernest, E., Knobel, D., Kazwala, R. R., Haydon, D. T., & Cleaveland, S. (2010) · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000626 · Cited by 398
Self-citationStreicker, D. G., Fenton, A., & Pedersen, A. B. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12122 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaare, M., Lembo, T., Hampson, K., Ernest, E., Estes, A., Mentzel, C., & Cleaveland, S.
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 152-160
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089780692
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rabies control in rural Africa: Evaluating strategies for effective domestic dog vaccination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.054
- The paper
- Kaare, M., Lembo, T., Hampson, K., Ernest, E., Estes, A., Mentzel, C., & Cleaveland, S. (2009). Rabies control in rural Africa: Evaluating strategies for effective domestic dog vaccination. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.