Cited by 83Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Prevention of cervical cancer in rural China: evaluation of HPV vaccination and primary HPV screening strategies

Canfell, Karen, Shi, Ju-Fang, Lew, Jie-Bin, Walker, Robert, Zhao, Fang-Hui, Simonella, Leonardo, Chen, Jun-Feng, Legood, Rosa +2 more·2011·Vaccine

Abstract

Comprehensive evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in China has not previously been performed. The objective of this study was to evaluate vaccination as an alternative or addition to primary HPV screening with careHPV (Qiagen, Gaithersburg, USA), and to assess the threshold total cost per vaccinated girl (CVG) at which strategies involving vaccination would become viable compared to screening-only strategies in rural China. We used data from field studies in Shanxi Province to support modelling of HPV vaccination and screening, including local information on sexual behaviour, HPV prevalence, test accuracy, treatment protocols and costs. We evaluated several strategies involving screening once or twice per lifetime or at regular 5-yearly intervals, with or without vaccination of young females at age 15 years, assuming 70% coverage for both screening and vaccination. We also predicted cross-sectional cancer incidence each year to the year 2050 for a range of strategies. We found that strategies involving vaccination would be cost-effective at CVGs of US$50-54 or less, but at CVGs >$54, screening-only strategies would be more cost-effective. If vaccination of young cohorts is combined with two rounds of careHPV screening for women aged 30-59 years in 2012 and 2027, a predicted indicative 33% reduction in cervical cancer incidence by 2030 would be sustained until 2050, with incidence rates decreasing thereafter. In conclusion, taking into account estimated vac…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.085

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 83

Authors
Canfell, K., Shi, J.-F., Lew, J.-B., Walker, R., Zhao, F.-H., Simonella, L., Chen, J.-F., Legood, R., Smith, M. A., & Nickson, C.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Council NSW (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Canfell, Karen
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03-16
Volume
29
Issue
13
Pages
2487-2494
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978173745
Cited by
83
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Council NSW
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
cervical cancer prevention, HPV vaccination, primary HPV testing, cost-effectiveness, rural China, Shanxi Province, cervical cancer incidence, HPV prevalence, sexual behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Child, China, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Virology, Models, Statistical, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review