Cited by 113Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyWomen's cancer prevention and management

Parental acceptance of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study

Jaspers, L., Budiningsih, S., Wolterbeek, R., Henderson, F.C., Peters, A.A.W.·2011·Vaccine

Abstract

Background Cervical cancer ranks the second most frequent cancer in Indonesian women. In Indonesia, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine acceptance has not been studied before. Objective To determine parental HPV vaccine acceptance in Indonesia, and factors that influence their decision. Factors include sociodemographic factors, knowledge of HPV, HPV vaccination and cervical cancer, health beliefs about cervical cancer, and attitudes towards vaccination in general. Methods 746 parents, with at least 1 daughter aged 0-14, were interviewed using questionnaires based on published and adjusted interviews. Interviews were done in sub district public health centers, general governmental hospitals, and via house-visits, in 5 Indonesian provinces. Results Parental HPV vaccine acceptance was 96.1%. Logistic regression revealed that age, beliefs regarding cervical cancer, and attitudes towards vaccination in general were significantly associated with HPV vaccine acceptance. Of the participants, 66.0%, 16.6%, and 15.8% had heard about cervical cancer, HPV, and HPV vaccination respectively. The mean total knowledge score was 1.91(Standard Deviation 2.31) on a 0-8 scale. Health beliefs about cervical cancer and attitudes towards vaccination in general were positive. Participants named the high cost of the vaccine, fear for side-effects, and chosen vaccination locations as possible barriers towards HPV vaccine implementation. Discussion Parental HPV vaccine acceptance is high, but knowledge…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaspers, L., Budiningsih, S., Wolterbeek, R., Henderson, F. C., & Peters, A. A. W.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • University of Indonesia (ID)
Corresponding author
Jaspers, L.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
29
Issue
44
Pages
7785-7793
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033726766
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universitas Udayana
  • Universitas Sumatera Utara
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
HPV vaccination, vaccine acceptance, parental attitudes, cervical cancer, HPV knowledge, health beliefs, barriers to vaccination, vaccine cost, vaccine side effect concerns, adolescent girls, Indonesia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Indonesia, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vaccination, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review