Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low birth weight: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunization safety data

Open access
Cutland, Clare L., Lackritz, Eve M., Mallett-Moore, Tamala, Bardají, Azucena, Chandrasekaran, Ravichandran, Lahariya, Chandrakant, Nisar, Muhammed Imran, Tapia, Milagritos D., Pathirana, Jayani, Kochhar, Sonali, Muñoz, Flor M.·2017·Vaccine

Abstract

Need for developing case definitions and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation for low birth weight as an adverse event following maternal immunization\n\nThe birth weight of an infant is the first weight recorded after birth, ideally measured within the first hours after birth, before significant postnatal weight loss has occurred. Low birth weight (LBW) is defined as a birth weight of less than 2500 g (up to and including 2499 g), as per the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. This definition of LBW has been in existence for many decades. In 1976, the 29th World Health Assembly agreed on the currently used definition. Prior to this, the definition of LBW was ‘2500 g or less’. Low birth weight is further categorized into very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500 g) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW, <1000 g) [1]. Low birth weight is a result of preterm birth (PTB, short gestation <37 completed weeks), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR, also known as fetal growth restriction), or both.\n\nThe term low birth weight refers to an absolute weight of <2500 g regardless of gestational age. Small for gestational age (SGA) refers to newborns whose birth weight is less than the 10th percentile for gestational age. This report will focus specifically on birth weight <2500 g. Further details related to case definitions for PTB [2], IUGR and SGA are included in separate GAIA reports.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.049

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 459

Metadata

Authors
Cutland, C. L., Lackritz, E. M., Mallett-Moore, T., Bardají, A., Chandrasekaran, R., Lahariya, C., Nisar, M. I., Tapia, M. D., Pathirana, J., Kochhar, S., & Muñoz, F. M.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
35
Issue
48
Pages
6492-6500
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768745408
Cited by
459
References
53
FWCI
28.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low birth weight: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunization safety data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.049
The paper
Cutland, C. L., Lackritz, E. M., Mallett-Moore, T., Bardají, A., Chandrasekaran, R., Lahariya, C., Nisar, M. I., Tapia, M. D., Pathirana, J., Kochhar, S., & Muñoz, F. M. (2017). Low birth weight: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunization safety data. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.