The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tetanus vaccines: WHO position paper, February 2017 – Recommendations
Abstract
This article presents the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendations on the use of tetanus toxoid (TT) vaccines excerpted from the WHO position paper on tetanus vaccines - February 2017, published in the Weekly Epidemiological Record [1]. This position paper replaces the May 2006 WHO position paper on tetanus vaccines (Tetanus vaccines: WHO position paper, 2006). The position paper summarizes the recent developments in the field of tetanus prevention and provides revised guidance on the optimal timing of recommended tetanus vaccine booster doses. Footnotes to this paper provide a number of core references including references to grading tables that assess the quality of the scientific evidence, and to the evidence-to-recommendation table. In accordance with its mandate to provide guidance to Member States on health policy matters, WHO issues a series of regularly updated position papers on vaccines and combinations of vaccines against diseases that have an international public health impact. These papers are concerned primarily with the use of vaccines in large-scale immunization programmes; they summarize essential background information on diseases and vaccines, and conclude with WHO's current position on the use of vaccines in the global context. Recommendations on the use of TT-containing vaccines (TTCVs) were discussed by SAGE in October 2016; evidence presented at the meeting can be accessed at: http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2016/october/presentations_background_docs/en/.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is known that provision of five or six doses of tetanus45 or diphtheria46 vaccine in childhood provides lifelong protection”
From A guide to vaccinology: from basic principles to new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
Tetanus vaccines: WHO position paper – February 2017, Weekly epidemiological record, No. 6, 92; 2017. p. 53–76.
(n.d.)
UnresolvedTetanus vaccines: WHO position paper – May 2006, Weekly epidemiological record, No. 20; 2006. p. 198–208.
(n.d.)
UnresolvedEvidence-to-recommendation table for tetanus vaccine. Available at: <http://www.who.int/immunization/policy/position_papers/tetanus/en/> [accessed February 2017].
(n.d.)
UnresolvedReducing pain at the time of vaccination: WHO position paper – September 2015, Weekly epidemiological record, No. 39; 2015. p. 505–10.
(n.d.)
Unresolved
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 4 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–109 of 109
Jiang, W., Li, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2026) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2026.2683761
Huang, R., Deng, X., Ren, H., et al. (2026) · Chinese Journal of Traumatology · doi:10.1016/j.cjtee.2026.06.003
Severe Malaria and Tetanus, Critical Co-Infection in Children
Ngapjang, C. D. T., Gobina, R. M., Fotso, C., et al. (2026) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1016922
Chinese expert consensus on tetanus prophylaxis in major trauma (2026 Edition)
Li, Y., Liu, S., Jin, P., et al. (2026) · Chinese Journal of Traumatology · doi:10.1016/j.cjtee.2026.06.002
Mohamed, J., Amoud, H. M., Mohamed, A. I., et al. (2026) · Public Health Challenges · doi:10.1002/puh2.70355
“The World Health Organization (WHO) also recommends this vaccine as the primary preventive measure for pregnant women to protect the mother and newborn from neonatal tetanus [ 4 ].”
Mhina, D. R., Laizer, Z. L., Hilari, O. T., et al. (2026) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.73262
Sbarra, A. N., Mutembo, S., Carcelen, A. C., Prosperi, C., Moss, W. J., Truelove, S., Winter, A. K., Bwalya, I. C., Betha, E., Kampamba, L., et al. (2026) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129160
Fang, Q., Mao, J., Gong, X., Liu, X., Zheng, C., Cao, G., & Yin, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1941921
Areda, D., Kim, H., Kang, J., Shalev, N., Poudyal, I., Kim, M. S., Sartorius, B. K. D., Aalruz, H., Razeq, N. M. I. A., Abd-Elsalam, S., et al. (2026) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104202
“34,35 Consistently higher tetanus burden among males may be attributable to greater exposure to injury-related activities, differences in healthcare-seeking behavior, and lower uptake of routine booster vaccination in adulthood; rare cases have also been reported following voluntary medical male…”
Metadata
- Authors
- World Health Organization
- Corresponding author
- World Health Organization
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 3573-3575
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210571587
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vaccine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- tetanus toxoid vaccine, tetanus prevention, booster vaccination, vaccination timing, immunization programs, WHO guidelines
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Immunization, Secondary, Infant, Pregnancy, Tetanus, Tetanus Toxoid, Vaccination, World Health Organization, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Immunization Programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review