The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of factors affecting vaccine uptake in young children
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Many parents make a conscious decision not to vaccinate their child. Multiple beliefs and perceptions surround this choice. If uptake of routine child vaccination is to increase, public health communications about vaccines must be informed by evidence on the factors affecting uptake. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review to investigate psychological, social and contextual factors associated with uptake of routine vaccines in young children. Studies were included if they reported analyses of the association between psychological factors and uptake or included parents' self-reported reasons for or against vaccination. RESULTS: Our search identified 9110 citations after deduplication. Sixty-eight citations describing sixty-four studies were included in the review. The quality of the studies was mixed. There is strong evidence for an association between vaccination uptake and: not perceiving vaccines to cause adverse effects; general positive attitudes towards vaccination; positive vaccine recommendations; and perceiving fewer practical difficulties of vaccination. While there was good evidence for an association between vaccination and perceived susceptibility to the illness, evidence for an association between perceived severity of an illness and vaccination was weak. Other factors associated with vaccination include knowledge about the vaccine, social influences and trust in the healthcare profession. Having increased information about the vaccine was associated with vaccination, but the influence of different sources of information needs more research. CONCLUSION: Understanding which factors are consistently associated with the decision to vaccinate one's child is important to identify messages which should be targeted by public health communications about routine child vaccinations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · cited 1×
“Messages could focus on increasing individuals’ capability, opportunity and motivation to vaccinate their child, as suggested by the behaviour change wheel [92].”
BackgroundThe Health Belief Model: a decade later.
Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818401100101 · Cited by 8,437
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies
Deeks, J., Dinnes, J., D'Amico, R., Sowden, A., Sakarovitch, C., Song, F., Petticrew, M., & Altman, D. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7270 · Cited by 2,907
Mills, E., Jadad, A. R., Ross, C., & Wilson, K. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.002 · Cited by 374
Cited by
Sherman, S. M., Smith, L. E., Sim, J., Amlôt, R., Cutts, M., Dasch, H., Rubin, G. J., & Sevdalis, N. (2021) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2020.1846397 · Cited by 758
Self-citationHow to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence
Webster, R. K., Brooks, S. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.007 · Cited by 422
Self-citationVoo, J. Y. H., Lean, Q. Y., Ming, L. C., Md. Hanafiah, N. H., Al-Worafi, Y. M., & Ibrahim, B. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9111348 · Cited by 380
Vaccine Safety: Myths and Misinformation
Geoghegan, S., O’Callaghan, K. P., & Offit, P. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00372 · Cited by 275
“While there will always be individuals with strongly held beliefs for whom well informed discussions about vaccine safety will have little impact, it has been repeatedly demonstrated that provider recommendation strongly influences decision making around vaccines (Smith et al., 2017).”
BackgroundThe impact of unplanned school closure on children’s social contact: rapid evidence review
Brooks, S. K., Smith, L. E., Webster, R. K., Weston, D., Woodland, L., Hall, I., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.13.2000188 · Cited by 159
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, L. E., Amlôt, R., Weinman, J., Yiend, J., & Rubin, G. J.
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 6059-6069
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2758307987
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of factors affecting vaccine uptake in young children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.046
- The paper
- Smith, L. E., Amlôt, R., Weinman, J., Yiend, J., & Rubin, G. J. (2017). A systematic review of factors affecting vaccine uptake in young children. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.