Post-licensure safety monitoring of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2009-2015.
Abstract
Background The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (4vHPV) for use in females and males aged 9-26 years, since 2006 and 2009 respectively. We characterized reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a US spontaneous reporting system, in females and males who received 4vHPV vaccination.Methods We searched VAERS for US reports of adverse events (AEs) following 4vHPV from January 2009 through December 2015. Signs and symptoms were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). We calculated reporting rates and conducted empirical Bayesian data mining to identify disproportional reports. Clinicians reviewed available information, including medical records, and reports of selected pre-specified conditions.Findings VAERS received 19,760 reports following 4vHPV; 60.2% in females, 17.2% in males, and in 22.6% sex was missing. Overall, 94.2% of reports were non-serious; dizziness, syncope and injection site reactions were commonly reported in both males and females. Headache, fatigue and nausea were commonly reported serious AEs. More than 60 million 4vHPV doses were distributed during the study period. Crude AE reporting rates were 327 reports per million 4vHPV doses distributed for all reports, and 19 per million for serious reports. Among 29 verified reports of death, there was no pattern of clustering of deaths by diagnosis, co-morbidities, age, or interval from vaccination to death.Interpretation No new or unexpected safety concerns or reporting patterns of 4vHPV with clinically important AEs were detected. Safety profile of 4vHPV is consistent with data from pre-licensure trials and postmarketing safety data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A registry-based cohort study in Finland including 134,615 vaccinated females and a review of 6 years of post-licensure VAERS data identified no unexpected safety concerns.
“This study is consistent with the findings of a registry based cohort study in Finland which included 134,615 vaccinated females and (Skufca et al., 2018) a review of 6 years of post-licensure data in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) which identified no unexpected safety concerns (Arana et al., 2018).”
From Vaccine Safety: Myths and Misinformation (2020) · cites this paper as Arana et al., 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Arana, J. E., Harrington, T., Cano, M., Lewis, P., Mba-Jonas, A., Rongxia, L., Stewart, B., Markowitz, L. E., & Shimabukuro, T. T.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Corresponding author
- Arana, Jorge E.
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1781-1788
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793299974
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vaccine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
- Keywords
- vaccine safety, post-licensure surveillance, VAERS, vaccine adverse events, syncope, injection site reactions, serious adverse events
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Bayes Theorem, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, United States, Vaccination, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Papillomavirus Infections, Alphapapillomavirus, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Young Adult, Public Health Surveillance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review