Cited by 50Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGenital Health and DiseaseReproductive tract infections research

Final analysis of a study assessing genital human papillomavirus genoprevalence in young Australian women, following eight years of a national vaccination program

Open access
Garland, Suzanne M., Cornall, Alyssa M., Brotherton, Julia M.L., Wark, John D., Malloy, Michael J., Tabrizi, Sepehr N.·2018·Vaccine

Abstract

Objectives The VACCINE [Vaccine Against Cervical Cancer Impact and Effectiveness] study evaluated the prevalence of quadrivalent vaccine-targeted human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes (HPV 6, 11, 16, 18) amongst young women of vaccine-eligible age. Methods Between October 2011 - June 2015, women aged 18-25 years from Victoria, Australia, were recruited through targeted advertising on the social networking website Facebook. Participants completed an online questionnaire and provided a self-collected vaginal swab for HPV DNA detection and genotyping (Linear Array HPV genotyping assay). Self-reported HPV vaccination details were verified with the National HPV Vaccination Program Register (NHVPR). Results Of 1223 who agreed to participate, 916 (74.9%) completed the survey and, for 1007 (82.3%) sexually-active participants, 744 (73.9%) returned the self-collected swab, of which 737 contained detectable DNA. 184/737 (25.0%) were positive for HPV. Vaccine-targeted HPV genotypes were detected in only 13 (1.7%) women: 11 HPV 16 (six vaccinated after sexual debut, five unvaccinated) and two HPV 6. Prevalence of any of HPV 31/33/45 collectively was 2.9%, varying significantly by vaccination status (fully 2.0%, unvaccinated 6.8%; p = 0.01). Vaccination rates among the sexually-active cohort were high, with 65.6%, 71.6% and 74.2% of participants having received three, at least two or at least one dose of vaccine, respectively. Of women self-reporting HPV vaccination, the NHVPR confirmed on…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.080

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garland, S. M., Cornall, A. M., Brotherton, J. M. L., Wark, J. D., Malloy, M. J., & Tabrizi, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Garland, Suzanne M.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
36
Issue
23
Pages
3221-3230
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800236160
Cited by
50
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccine (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Health, Australian Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
human papillomavirus, HPV genotypes, quadrivalent HPV vaccine, HPV vaccination program, young women, cross-protection, HPV16, HPV 6, vaccination status, sexual partners, Victoria, Australia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cervix Uteri, Female, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior, Socioeconomic Factors, Victoria, Prevalence, Immunization Programs, Papillomavirus Infections, Human papillomavirus 16, Alphapapillomavirus, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review