Strategies to increase vaccine acceptance and uptake: From behavioral insights to context-specific, culturally-appropriate, evidence-based communications and interventions
Open accessAbstract
Strategies to increase vaccine acceptance and uptake: From behavioral insights to context-specific, culturally-appropriate, evidence-based communications and interventions
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers have identified promising interventions for building confidence and reducing vaccine hesitancy in different contexts.
“Researchers have identified promising interventions for building confidence and reducing vaccine hesitancy in different contexts12,13”
From A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 74
- Authors
- Thomson, A., Vallée-Tourangeau, G., & Suggs, L. S.
- Affiliations
- Sanofi (France) (FR)
- Kingston University London (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Thomson, Angus
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 6457-6458
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2891543977
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Vaccine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Repository (Kingston University London) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
- Keywords
- vaccine acceptance, vaccine uptake, behavioural insights, health communication, culturally sensitive interventions, context-specific interventions, vaccine hesitancy
- MeSH terms
- Vaccination Coverage, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Vaccines, Health Communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
