RNA-based adjuvant CV8102 enhances the immunogenicity of a licensed rabies vaccine in a first-in-human trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: We report the first-in-concept human trial of the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity when a novel TLR 7/8/RIG I agonist RNA-based adjuvant, CV8102, was administered alone or mixed with fractional doses of a licensed rabies vaccine (Rabipur®) as model antigen. METHODS: The primary objective was to assess the safety and reactogenicity of various dose levels of CV8102 alone or mixed with Rabipur® in healthy 18-40 year-old male volunteers. A secondary objective was to assess the immune-enhancing potential of bedside-mixes of CV8102 with fractional doses of Rabipur® by measuring induction of rabies virus neutralising titres (VNTs). RESULTS: Fifty-six volunteers received 50-100 μg CV8102 alone (n = 11), bedside-mixed CV8102 and Rabipur® (n = 20), or Rabipur® alone (n = 25; control). When given alone or mixed with Rabipur® CV8102 caused mostly Grade 1 or 2 local or systemic reactogenicity, but no related SAEs. As 100 µg CV8102 was associated with marked CRP increases further dose escalation was stopped. Combining 25-50 µg of CV8102 with fractional doses of Rabipur® significantly improved the kinetics of VNT responses; 50 µg CV8102 also improved the magnitude of VNT responses to 1/10 Rabipur® but caused severe but self-limiting influenza-like symptoms in 2 of 14 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 25 and 50 µg CV8102 appeared safe and with an acceptable reactogenicity profile while significantly enhancing the immunogenicity of fractional doses of rabies vaccine. EudraCT No. 2013-004514-18.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Results were consistent with lymphocyte counts and concentrations of C-reactive protein reported as pharmacodynamic markers after administration of mRNA vaccines against influenza and rabies.
“Results were consistent with lymphocyte counts12 and concentrations of C-reactive protein13, 14 reported as pharmacodynamics markers after administration of mRNA vaccines against influenza and rabies.”
From Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 ARCoV mRNA vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
The Results (section 3.2; page unavailable) report dose-dependent CRP increases after the RNA-based adjuvant CV8102, including when mixed with a rabies vaccine. But the Background (section 1; page unavailable) identifies CV8102 as a non-coding RNA adjuvant and the rabies vaccine as a licensed vaccine used with it; this was not a trial of an mRNA rabies vaccine. This source does not report lymphocyte counts or CRP after an mRNA influenza vaccine. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 48
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Heinzerling L, Krauss J, Weishaupt C, et al. Phase I dose-escalation and expansion study of intratumoral CV8102, a RNA-based TLR-and RIG-1 agonist with or without anti-PD1 antibodies in patients with advanced solid tumors. 33rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 7-11, 2018, Washington DC, USA. Abstract P337. J Immunotherap Canc 2018;6 (Suppl 1):172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0422-y. · DOI
- Authors
- Doener, F., Hong, H. S., Meyer, I., Tadjalli-Mehr, K., Daehling, A., Heidenreich, R., Koch, S. D., Fotin-Mleczek, M., & Gnad-Vogt, U.
- Affiliations
- CureVac (Germany) (DE)
- Clinical Research Services (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gnad-Vogt, Ulrike
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1819-1826
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2915991550
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Vaccine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Rabies epidemiology and control
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
- Keywords
- rabies vaccine, immunogenicity enhancement, reactogenicity, safety and tolerability, C-reactive protein
- MeSH terms
- Immunogenicity, Vaccine, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Adult, Antibodies, Viral, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Male, Rabies, Rabies Vaccines, Rabies virus, Vaccination, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Healthy Volunteers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review