Cited by 23SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Reactogenicity within 2 weeks after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: Findings from the CDC v-safe surveillance system

Open access
Chapin-Bardales, Johanna, Myers, Tanya, Gee, Julianne, Shay, David K., Marquez, Paige, Baggs, James, Zhang, Bicheng, Licata, Charles +1 more·2021·Vaccine

Abstract

Background Post-authorization monitoring of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines is needed to better characterize their reactogenicity. We assessed reactions reported during the 2 weeks after receipt of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines.Methods We monitored persons who enrolled in v-safe after vaccination health checker SM, a U.S. smartphone-based vaccine monitoring system, after receiving BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. V-safe participants received text message prompts to complete web-based surveys. We analyzed responses from persons who received BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 from December 14, 2020 through March 14, 2021 and completed at least one survey by March 28, 2021. We measured the proportion of participants reporting local and systemic reactions solicited in surveys completed days 0 through 7 post-vaccination. For day 14 surveys, participants described new or worsening symptoms in a free-text response. We assessed the proportion of participants reporting new or worsening local and systemic reactions.Results One-third of participants were aged <45 years, two-thirds were female, and approximately half received BNT162b2 vaccine. A total of 4,717,908 participants reported during the 7 days after dose 1 and 2,906,377 reported during the 7 days after dose 2. Most reported at least one injection-site reaction (68.5% after dose 1; 72.9% after dose 2) or at least one systemic reaction (50.6% after dose 1; 69.5% after dose 2). Reactogenicity was greater after dose 2 and among mRNA-1273 recipients, persons aged <45 years, and females. New or worsening local and systemic reactions were uncommon during week 2 after either dose; the most frequent were local reactions for dose 1 mRNA-1273 recipients (2.6%). These reactions were reported more often among females after dose 1 mRNA-1273 (3.6%).Conclusions During post-authorization monitoring among >4 million vaccinees, local and systemic reactions were commonly reported following mRNA-based vaccines. Reactions were most common during the first week following dose 2 and among persons aged <45 years, females, and mRNA-1273 recipients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.019

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings are in line with real-world evidence on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273) which describe higher reactogenicity in females compared with males.

    “These findings are in line with the real-world evidence on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273) which describe higher reactogenicity in females compared with males38,39.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]Cassell DL. The Basics of the PRX Functions. SAS Global Forum 2007. Paper 223-2007. https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings/proceedings/forum2007/223-2007.pdf; [accessed April 14, 2021].
  2. [15]Walsh E.E. Frenck R.W. Falsey A.R. Kitchin N. Absalon J. Gurtman A. Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates N Engl J Med 383 25 2020 2439 2450 10.1056/NEJMoa2027906 33053279 PMC7583697 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Chapin-Bardales, J., Myers, T., Gee, J., Shay, D. K., Marquez, P., Baggs, J., Zhang, B., Licata, C., & Shimabukuro, T. T.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Gee, Julianne
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
39
Issue
48
Pages
7066-7073
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3206453350
Cited by
23
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, vaccine reactogenicity, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, injection site reactions, systemic reactions, vaccine safety, sex differences, age differences
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Female, Humans, RNA, Messenger, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review