Cited by 107Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsEthics in Clinical Research

A review of criteria strictness in “Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials”

Open access
Amai, Motoki, Nojima, Masanori, Yuki, Yoshikazu, Kiyono, Hiroshi, Nagamura, Fumitaka·2023·Vaccine

Abstract

To assess safety in vaccine development, stricter grading scales, such as the "Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials" issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA grading scale), are required. However, concern exists that their strictness may lead to an overestimation of some adverse events (AEs). We analyzed the details of AEs in a phase I clinical trial of a preventive vaccine for infectious diseases. In this trial, we observed the high occurrence of Grade 1 or greater AEs in hemoglobin changes from baseline value, and hypernatremia, and hypokalemia by FDA grading scale. The range considered as non-AE according to the FDA grading scale shifted or became narrower when compared to reference intervals, especially for a Japanese cohort. For sodium grading, the criterion for hypernatremia was around 2 to mEq/L lower than the upper limit of most standards in several countries. Also, the criterion for hypokalemia was around 0.2 mEq/L higher than the lower limit of most standards. Regarding a decrease in hemoglobin from baseline, the criterion of "any decrease" used for a Grade 1 AE was too strict and we suggest this be omitted. Upper and lower limits of AE criteria for sodium and potassium should be equal to, or 10-20% above, the reference interval consistent with other toxicities determined by laboratory tests. Consideration should be given to the issues surrounding the criteria that determine AEs…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.072

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amai, M., Nojima, M., Yuki, Y., Kiyono, H., & Nagamura, F.
Affiliations
  • IMSUT Hospital (JP)
  • Chiba University Hospital (JP)
  • Chiba University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nojima, Masanori
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
41
Issue
38
Pages
5622-5629
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385459314
Cited by
107
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K10298)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hemoglobin decrease, reference values, vaccine safety assessment, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Hemoglobins, Humans, Hypernatremia, Hypokalemia, Vaccines, Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review