Cited by 5Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyGlobal Maternal and Child HealthHealthcare Systems and Reforms

Landscaping analysis of immunization progress and program structures in selected middle income Southeast Asian countries

Basa, Jessabelle E., Clemens, Ralf, Clemens, Sue Ann Costa, Nicholson, Martin·2024·Vaccine

Abstract

This study examined the performance and structures of national immunization program in five middle-income Southeast Asian countries - Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Viet Nam, and Myanmar, and analyzed how the different structures relate to the difference in program performance to identify effective strategies in the study countries that facilitated good immunization performance. Data were derived from published literature, and WHO/UNICEF/Gavi databases, with 2010 as the baseline year. UMICs Malaysia and Thailand maintained ≥90 % coverage from 2010 to 2020 and even during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. LMICs Viet Nam and donor-supported Myanmar also achieved 80-90 % coverage for most routine vaccines in 2020. The Philippines have not reached ≥90 % coverage since 2010, with the maximum only 72 % (MCV1 and Polio3) in 2020. All study countries prioritize immunization and increased government financing since 2010 by minimum 91 % in Malaysia and 1897 % in Myanmar. However, Myanmar still largely depended on donor support with government financing only 32 % of immunization costs in 2021. The Philippines funds 100 % of immunization costs and ensures sustainable financing for the NIP through earmarked "sin tax" revenues from alcohol and tobacco. Donor support influenced new vaccine introductions among the study countries, with Gavi countries Myanmar and Viet Nam introducing more new vaccines, compared to Gavi-ineligible Malaysia and Thailand. The Philippines reported vaccine stock-ou…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Myanmar integrated HPV vaccination into its national immunization programme, financed through GAVI.

    “Similarly, countries such as Myanmar integrated HPV vaccination into their national immunization programme, financed through GAVI57.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 15 · Cited by 5

Authors
Basa, J. E., Clemens, R., Clemens, S. A. C., & Nicholson, M.
Affiliations
University of Siena (IT)
Corresponding author
Basa, Jessabelle E.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
2326-2336
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392448347
Cited by
5
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
UNICEF
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Keywords
National Immunization Program, vaccination coverage, vaccine financing, donor support, vaccine stockouts, vaccine introduction, Gavi, COVID-19 pandemic impact on immunization, middle-income countries, Southeast Asia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam, Myanmar
MeSH terms
Vaccination Coverage, Asia, Southeastern, Developing Countries, Humans, Immunization Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review