Landscaping analysis of immunization progress and program structures in selected middle income Southeast Asian countries
Abstract
This study examined the performance and structures of national immunization program in five middle-income Southeast Asian countries - Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Viet Nam, and Myanmar, and analyzed how the different structures relate to the difference in program performance to identify effective strategies in the study countries that facilitated good immunization performance. Data were derived from published literature, and WHO/UNICEF/Gavi databases, with 2010 as the baseline year. UMICs Malaysia and Thailand maintained ≥90 % coverage from 2010 to 2020 and even during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. LMICs Viet Nam and donor-supported Myanmar also achieved 80-90 % coverage for most routine vaccines in 2020. The Philippines have not reached ≥90 % coverage since 2010, with the maximum only 72 % (MCV1 and Polio3) in 2020. All study countries prioritize immunization and increased government financing since 2010 by minimum 91 % in Malaysia and 1897 % in Myanmar. However, Myanmar still largely depended on donor support with government financing only 32 % of immunization costs in 2021. The Philippines funds 100 % of immunization costs and ensures sustainable financing for the NIP through earmarked "sin tax" revenues from alcohol and tobacco. Donor support influenced new vaccine introductions among the study countries, with Gavi countries Myanmar and Viet Nam introducing more new vaccines, compared to Gavi-ineligible Malaysia and Thailand. The Philippines reported vaccine stock-ou…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Myanmar integrated HPV vaccination into its national immunization programme, financed through GAVI.
“Similarly, countries such as Myanmar integrated HPV vaccination into their national immunization programme, financed through GAVI57.”
From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 15 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Basa, J. E., Clemens, R., Clemens, S. A. C., & Nicholson, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Siena (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Basa, Jessabelle E.
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2326-2336
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392448347
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Vaccine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- UNICEF
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Keywords
- National Immunization Program, vaccination coverage, vaccine financing, donor support, vaccine stockouts, vaccine introduction, Gavi, COVID-19 pandemic impact on immunization, middle-income countries, Southeast Asia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam, Myanmar
- MeSH terms
- Vaccination Coverage, Asia, Southeastern, Developing Countries, Humans, Immunization Programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review