Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

An England-wide survey on attitudes towards antenatal and infant immunisation against respiratory syncytial virus amongst pregnant and post-partum women

Broad, Jonathan, Letley, Louise, Adair, Georgie, Walker, Jemma, Benzaken, Tami, Saliba, Vanessa, Ramsay, Mary E., Watson, Conall H., Campbell, Helen·2025·Vaccine

Abstract

BACKGROUND Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes significant morbidity. New immunisations to protect infants have been licensed in the UK including a vaccine in pregnancy and a monoclonal antibody injection in infants. The UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation has advised that either could be considered suitable for a national programme. We conducted a survey of pregnant women to understand acceptability and barriers to RSV immunisation. METHODS 73,734 women were emailed a Health Security Agency survey on decision making around maternal and baby health via a parent support organisation. The survey collected baseline demographics, expressed likelihood of accepting maternal vaccine or immunisation for their infant, and perceptions of potential barriers, using likert scales and free text questions. Eligibility criteria were: pregnant or with a child up to 6 months of age, living in England, 18 years or older. Responses were quantified descriptively; binary logistic regression was used to measure multivariable associations; thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data. RESULTS 1061 women completed the survey. Respondents were likely to accept maternal RSV vaccination (89.5 %, 95 % CI 87.5-91.3) or infant immunisation (81.4 %, 95 % CI 79.0-83.7). Multivariable analysis showed higher acceptability was associated with having a partner and possible association with ethnicity. No difference was observed by deprivation, or disability status on multivariable analysis. Participants most trusted midwives for information. CONCLUSION Maternal and infant RSV immunisations were both highly acceptable, supporting the roll out of either programme. Ongoing monitoring will support evaluation of programme implementation and equity of access.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127482

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 10

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Li, 2022, Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in children younger than 5 years in 2019: a systematic analysis, Lancet, 399, 2047, 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00478-0 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cromer, 2017, Burden of paediatric respiratory syncytial virus disease and potential effect of different immunisation strategies: a modelling and cost-effectiveness analysis for England, Lancet Public Health, 2, e367, 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30103-2 · DOI
  3. Reeves, 2017, Estimating the burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) on respiratory hospital admissions in children less than five years of age in England, 2007-2012, Influenza Other Respir. Viruses, 11, 122, 10.1111/irv.12443 · DOI
  4. Hammitt, 2022, Nirsevimab for prevention of RSV in healthy late-preterm and term infants, N. Engl. J. Med., 386, 837, 10.1056/NEJMoa2110275 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kampmann, 2023, Bivalent Prefusion F vaccine in pregnancy to prevent RSV illness in infants, N. Engl. J. Med., 388, 1451, 10.1056/NEJMoa2216480 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ares-Gómez, 2024, Effectiveness and impact of universal prophylaxis with nirsevimab in infants against hospitalisation for respiratory syncytial virus in Galicia, Spain: initial results of a population-based longitudinal study, Lancet Infect. Dis., 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00215-9 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ernst, 2024, Impact of nirsevimab prophylaxis on paediatric respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related hospitalisations during the initial 2023/24 season in Luxembourg, Euro Surveill, 29, 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.4.2400033 · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2024.29.4.2400033
  8. Paireau, 2024, Nirsevimab effectiveness against cases of respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis hospitalised in Paediatric intensive care units in France, September 2023-January 2024, Influenza Other Respir. Viruses, 18, 10.1111/irv.13311 · DOI
  9. Hodgson, 2024, Protecting infants against RSV disease: an impact and cost-effectiveness comparison of long-acting monoclonal antibodies and maternal vaccination, Lancet Reg Health Eur, 38
  10. Brunton, 2024, Uptake of intra-muscular vitamin K administration after birth: a national cohort study, Acta Paediatr., 113, 1264, 10.1111/apa.17168 · doi:10.1111/apa.17168
  11. Sumilo, 2012, Prevalence and impact of disability in women who had recently given birth in the UK, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 12, 31, 10.1186/1471-2393-12-31 · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-12-31
  12. Samad, 2006, Differences in risk factors for partial and no immunisation in the first year of life: prospective cohort study, Bmj, 332, 1312, 10.1136/bmj.332.7553.1312 · DOI
  13. Paulson, 2024, Protecting against respiratory syncytial virus: an online questionnaire study exploring UK parents acceptability of vaccination in pregnancy or monoclonal antibody administration for infants, medRxiv, 2024
  14. Saper, 2024, RSV vaccination intention among people who are or plan to become pregnant, Pediatrics, 153, 10.1542/peds.2023-065140 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ayouni, 2023, Interventions to improve knowledge, attitudes, and uptake of recommended vaccines during pregnancy and postpartum: a scoping review, Vaccines (Basel), 11
  16. Mohammed, 2019, A systematic review of interventions to improve uptake of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy, PLoS One, 14, 10.1371/journal.pone.0214538 · DOI
  17. Wilson, 2019, Strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance, BMC Public Health, 19, 342, 10.1186/s12889-019-6655-y · DOI
  18. Razai, 2024, Facilitators and barriers to vaccination uptake in pregnancy: a qualitative systematic review, PLoS One, 19, 10.1371/journal.pone.0298407 · DOI
  19. Harteveld, 2024, Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prevention: perception and willingness of expectant parents in the Netherlands, medRxiv, 2024

Metadata

Authors
Broad, J., Letley, L., Adair, G., Walker, J., Benzaken, T., Saliba, V., Ramsay, M. E., Watson, C. H., & Campbell, H.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-08
Volume
62
Pages
127482
ISSN
0264-410X
Cited by
10
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An England-wide survey on attitudes towards antenatal and infant immunisation against respiratory syncytial virus amongst pregnant and post-partum women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127482
The paper
Broad, J., Letley, L., Adair, G., Walker, J., Benzaken, T., Saliba, V., Ramsay, M. E., Watson, C. H., & Campbell, H. (2025). An England-wide survey on attitudes towards antenatal and infant immunisation against respiratory syncytial virus amongst pregnant and post-partum women. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127482

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.