The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Canine lymphoma as a comparative model for human non-Hodgkin lymphoma: recent progress and applications
Open accessAbstract
The term “lymphoma” describes a heterogeneous group of disorders involving monoclonal proliferation of malignant lymphocytes. As a group, lymphomas are among the most common tumors of dogs. Yet our enumeration and understanding of the many subtypes of lymphoma have been relatively slow, perhaps in part because for many years lymphoma was treated as a singular entity rather than a group of distinct diseases. The recognition that the full spectrum of lymphoid malignancies seen in humans also occurs in dogs, and that these tumors retain not only morphologic similarities and biological behavior but also synonymous driver molecular abnormalities, sets an ideal stage for dual-purpose research that can accelerate progress for these diseases in both species. Specifically, dogs represent exceptional models for defining causality, understanding progression, and developing new treatments for lymphoma in comparatively brief windows of time. Unique advantages of canine models include (1) spontaneous disease occurring without an isogenic background or genetic engineering; (2) chronology of disease adapted to lifespan, (3) shared environment and societal status that allows dogs to be treated as “patients,” while at the same time being able to ethically explore translational innovations that are not possible in human subjects; and (4) organization of dogs into breeds with relatively homogeneous genetic backgrounds and distinct predisposition for lymphomas. Here, we will review recent studies describing intrinsic and extrinsic factors that contribute to the pathogenesis of canine and human lymphomas, as well as newly developed tools that will enhance the fidelity of these models to improve diagnosis and develop new treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Honigberg, L. A., Smith, A. M., Sirisawad, M., Verner, E., Loury, D., Chang, B., Li, S., Pan, Z., Thamm, D. H., Miller, R. A., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1004594107 · Cited by 1,561
Targeting HIF1α Eliminates Cancer Stem Cells in Hematological Malignancies
Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Malek, S. N., Zheng, P., & Liu, Y. (2011) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.02.006 · Cited by 410 · cited 1×
“Howver, there are only a few reports supporting the existence f TICs in human lymphoma cell lines or in transgenic ymphoma mouse models (Lee et al., 2012; Vega et al., 009; Wang et al., 2011).”
Cited by
Cancer immunotherapy targeting the CD47/SIRPα axis
Weiskopf, K. (2017) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.013 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Ito, D., Frantz, A. M., & Modiano, J. F.
- Venue
- Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 192-201
- ISSN
- 0165-2427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037487541
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Canine lymphoma as a comparative model for human non-Hodgkin lymphoma: recent progress and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.02.016
- The paper
- Ito, D., Frantz, A. M., & Modiano, J. F. (2014). Canine lymphoma as a comparative model for human non-Hodgkin lymphoma: recent progress and applications. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.02.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.